Memorandum coming her, she makes it clear better than i do the issue why am my response to 3 is garbled its a bit of a in his normal we need a knowledgeable representative we perform a valuable intense but unfortunately constrained fact finding admission we need someone to answer questions like what efforts were made to go through our staff persons email for records we need someone that knows the answer like that this is a request we need someone knowledgeable about a complaint im mindful the possibility of this violation reaching the xhoiks is the rarest of the 3 am i wrong on that regard. They seem to be usually included in other violations. Again, this is a scenario by the time the results its referred to ethnics weve admonished this is not working we need the inclines so you can tells you more and send someone that knows not only an authorized representative well have experience where someone comes and says we conducted a use but that is an unauthorized representative that is optio
Finding admission we need someone to answer questions like what efforts were made to go through our staff persons email for records we need someone that knows the answer like that this is a request we need someone knowledgeable about a complaint im mindful the possibility of this violation reaching the xhoiks is the rarest of the 3 am i wrong on that regard. They seem to be usually included in other violations. Again, this is a scenario by the time the results its referred to ethnics weve admonished this is not working we need the inclines so you can tells you more and send someone that knows not only an authorized representative well have experience where someone comes and says we conducted a use but that is an unauthorized representative that is option 3 but not suite our concerns with the investigation of the complaint and everyone comes to the issues at play and little violations necessary. Yes. Weve had occasions where a staff person comes and reads a statement then be unable to g
Clarifying and having read former chairpersons hope memorandum coming her, she makes it clear better than i do the issue why am my response to 3 is garbled its a bit of a in his normal we need a knowledgeable representative we perform a valuable intense but unfortunately constrained fact finding admission we need someone to answer questions like what efforts were made to go through our staff persons email for records we need someone that knows the answer like that this is a request we need someone knowledgeable about a complaint im mindful the possibility of this violation reaching the xhoiks is the rarest of the 3 am i wrong on that regard. They seem to be usually included in other violations. Again, this is a scenario by the time the results its referred to ethnics weve admonished this is not working we need the inclines so you can tells you more and send someone that knows not only an authorized representative well have experience where someone comes and says we conducted a use but
Against an individual someone would can be held accountable and provide we precede with our notice of obligation by issue won those are appropriate options options. I think its impossible for the task force to weigh in informally not having had a changing chance to discuss it my initially reaction it seems reasonable i guess based on my experience over the years i can think of cases there was a clear violation but we couldnt come up with anyone to hold responsible you know something was awry the department or agency probably due to just lack of training or having policies in place or you know way back when we were getting to know the ordinance you know go being unfamiliar and the place parts are imambitions and need clarification i cant think of a specific case i know over the years weve been hard presses to name a person without naming a Development Head without understanding the case that person was not directly responsible in any way that you would want to have it in their personnel
Specifically targeted against isis itself. And it would be very hard to see how there would be any stretch that would fit any Legal Authority whatsoever to direct that. There are other legal arguments availability to deal with president assad. Let me make that clear. Not the least of which is the fact that if he were to join in an effort that actively engaged with isil or we had evidence of that in some way. He could be thereby aiding and abetting. Theres an extensive argument you could make. But, no not directly out of the aumf. That would not be anywhere in what is envisioned or allowed by it. With respect to the drc and exit permit, we have raised that issue. Ive talked to the president about it personally. Weve had we have an ongoing effort to try to make some progress on that and im hopeful that we will finally get some kind of success. These are those difficult internal kinds of, you know, negotiations that take place. Theyre very i think this may be tied to the prospects of the