Maybe why dont you give some opening remarks and the Commission Asks the project sponsor to come back up. Okay offering geeze 10 minutes. Hello, im peter on behalf of the Entertainment Corporation doing business as as jones on jones street here in San Francisco in the summer of 09 metro policy was formed and entered into a long term lease and purchased a Liquor License at 620 jones street weve invested more than 2 and a half Million Dollars into the restaurant known as jones in making those investment we relied on the information on the official we are talking about website is contained a conditional use authorization form at the request of a group which undertook to develop this property prior to us the cu provided on the Planning Department website so on and so forth 7 conditions none of which limit the establishments hours of operation this was all the information that was publicly available ward to our conditional use permit we were shocked when we got the enforcement notification
Impact will create a significant change. Using polk street as an example, how do certain areas of a city get factor spwaod a plan especially when you have both sides of an area which will have significant dedication to bicycle lanes. Sometimes these things seem to be in conflict and we have other initiatives that also utilize that space and so loading zones. Yeah. And id like to also note from you what information you may need ahead of the hearing to review the sfmtas Strategic Plan for 2013, 18, get information on that are transit first policy, information on their current plans, bicycle plans, roll and function of the bicycle advisory, pedestrian advisory committee, if theres any sort of internal policies in terms of rules and functions and they work with specific organizations like the bike organization and other committees that do advise them or they consult with. And then what information do you think the sfmta needs to hear that we can help organize nice organize and put together
Know it existed and that lays out these plans citywide. Its 800 pages, but you can go through it, which is what we did in our neighborhood to see what parts were about columbus after and thats where we saw that they had these impacts that were extremely negative and had no suggestions for mitigation. I found that to be very interesting to look at and i would request they look at it and we do also. You know, we could pull out the parts that are relevant because its citywide, but it pretty much goes through every commercial corridor thats projected to have changes. Commissioner riley. Yes, i want to follow what commissioner dooley was talking about. I said that we need to see the six items prior to the meeting so we can identify areas of concern, and i also think that mta needs to see all of that as well so they can identify areas that are contradicting or impacting each otherss plan and they can come prepared toens d answer some of the questions. I think that would be more productive. D
Current are operators of jones is approving of the activity and the project sponsor has significant outreach to neighborhood including replacing windows, however, the modified conditions will run with the land and in the ownership or the tenant changes future operators will be lows engaged with the community extending the hours would be a negative issue and they meet the planning code but not compatible with the that concludes my presentation. Im happy to answer questions. Project sponsor. Im wondering if it would be acceptable to allow anyone who is here to oppose the project to present first and well go after that. It is a strange request maybe why dont you give some opening remarks and the Commission Asks the project sponsor to come back up. Okay offering geeze 10 minutes. Hello, im peter on behalf of the Entertainment Corporation doing business as as jones on jones street here in San Francisco in the summer of 09 metro policy was formed and entered into a long term lease and purcha
Violation of the gop Good Neighbor policy the Department Recommendations disapproval and believes the project is not desirable Outdoor Activity area is leaked in a dense area between two hotels to extend the hours of operation on the patio to 2 00 a. M. That will be a nuisance for hotel guests the current are operators of jones is approving of the activity and the project sponsor has significant outreach to neighborhood including replacing windows, however, the modified conditions will run with the land and in the ownership or the tenant changes future operators will be lows engaged with the community extending the hours would be a negative issue and they meet the planning code but not compatible with the that concludes my presentation. Im happy to answer questions. Project sponsor. Im wondering if it would be acceptable to allow anyone who is here to oppose the project to present first and well go after that. It is a strange request maybe why dont you give some opening remarks and the