Residential model would produce an anchor grocery store. There was a question raised about a master plan, you only have authority over the Transit Center, there are 6, 7 other buildings going up, tens of thousands of people and at least i dont think there is any general plan of what services that have to be provided that are absolutely required if the project is going to succeed and realizing the circumstance without cars. I dont know whats going to happen when you get these proposals in june, but it seems to me that theres a lot of thinking that still should be done about how the retail works out, even though it would be lovely to get retail in here and have them paying money so that the deficits that have been accumulating over the last few months can be resolved. On the sponsorship question, supervisor or famous people, theyre not named after corporations. I think to name it the google Transit Center or the twitter terminal would be bad in many, many, many respects. I think the term
Are moving people throughout the state and areas that are dont have as much of a workload and moving them to bay area, so they have a lot of their carpenters now on the list that are available, so they see no issues as well. Then the laborers are working with webcor, in a few slides, youll show the fruit of that effort in the diagram. Showing back to a slide with steve, bringing us back to the hours of apprentices, we have over 231 thousand with the majority from San Francisco and of that showing our meeting our goals of taking out the operator s and laborers. This is a grap weve shown here, you can see the last corridor how we talked, there was a dip in the labor apprentices, you can see the red, orange aish area has shown some fruit to that effort and it will continue going forward. And with the operators, the operators continue to have very good numbers on their apprentice front and then this is a graph of all the as you roll them all for all crafts, so to wrap up my presentation, i
People, theyre not named after corporations. I think to name it the google Transit Center or the twitter terminal would be bad in many, many, many respects. I think the term limits if you expect to get money from philanthropy, you cant put terms on it which is not a particular good idea, and i dont know i talked to the gentleman who gave the proposal afterwards and he had no idea how much money was required and he acted like he hadnt talked to anybody yet and two months is not a very long period of time to go out, go in the neighborhood and find millions and millions of dollars for sponsorships. It seems to me unless something comes back, its really great, youre much better off waiting until this project has the kind of visibility of what people actually see, particularly the park. You should be able to raise 30 Million Dollars from philanthropy to fix the park problem, you really should but its not something you can do in two weeks with an rfq. Its a lot of work and i would suggest yo
Ewe unanimously, none opposed. Item number 89 is approving an amendment to the contract number 0804cmgc000 authorizing Webcor Obayashi joint venture to execute a trade work subcontract with pacific erectors inc. As the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid in the amount of 19 million 553 thousand for tg08. 4, metal panels thereby increasing authorized direct costs by 19 million 553 thousand and the authorized Construction Services fixed fee by 1 million 486 thousand 28 dollars. Do we need a presentation on this. Youre up, mark. We received we had four prequalified bidders, we received three bids ranging between 19. 455 and 28 Million Dollars, [inaudible] in this amount of 19. 55 Million Dollars, pacific erectors bid was [inaudible] but 5. 4 Million Dollars above our budget of 14 Million Dollars, and were commending to award it to pacific erectors for the point of [inaudible] and fund the balance from the reserves. This isnt the skin, right . No. This is other panels.
Meps were awarded late last year, weve been nesting the scope with them, making sure they understand what the scope is, we expect to get prices end of this month, early next month. If that doesnt work, we can turn around and bid them out in the august timeframe, were hoping to come to a conclusion with the existing bidders. Its a matter of we wont be able to execute the change orders until after the budget has been updated. What time of exclusion does that caoe create the total cost of the park, our estimate is 38 million dollars. The estimate for the landscaping package thats currently being advertised is 24. 5 million dollars. So, theres about i want to say 5 million dollars, theres probably more than that that were negotiating with them, but i dont want to tell them how much we want to pay for it. Is there a motion for approval . Move approval. We have a motion and a second. Is there any objection to the motion . Seeing none, it passes unanimously. And well note for the record that