And the photographs that i have, could we have the overhead . I need the overhead enlarged victor. From what the neighbors could see of the work being conducted, at the site, this was certainly not done in one day. These are shots that they could only take through the open doors. The entire building was gutted. As you can see from the new steel walls, the work had been going on for weeks. So, the implication that somehow they got their permit and they got them on time and they got it done, that is just not correct. We supplied the board with the permit history and the complaint history of this site just for a bit of flavor, if you will. And that is the exhibit 4, and exhibit 5 to my brief. To show that this owner never gets permits. A 40yearold building which does not have a single final permit. If you look at exhibit 5, i set out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk r
Out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk repair permit and a street permit and the permit in front of you today. And so, even with all of the tenant problems and the complaints that took months to prepare and for the 40yearold building there has never been a single permit taken out until the neighbors complained about work going on and in the current permit was taken out. The neighbors filed this appeal because they had no idea what was going on. They attended a Community Meeting i believe it was on november the fifth and within a few days of attending that Community Meeting about the wireless antenna facility, the construction started. They had no choice, having received no notice, no permits and no plans, on file anywhere. And could not get any information, they had no choice but to assume that they were starting the work on the wireless facility. And i dont think th
Out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk repair permit and a street permit and the permit in front of you today. And so, even with all of the tenant problems and the complaints that took months to prepare and for the 40yearold building there has never been a single permit taken out until the neighbors complained about work going on and in the current permit was taken out. The neighbors filed this appeal because they had no idea what was going on. They attended a Community Meeting i believe it was on november the fifth and within a few days of attending that Community Meeting about the wireless antenna facility, the construction started. They had no choice, having received no notice, no permits and no plans, on file anywhere. And could not get any information, they had no choice but to assume that they were starting the work on the wireless facility. And i dont think th
Permit. If you look at exhibit 5, i set out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk repair permit and a street permit and the permit in front of you today. And so, even with all of the tenant problems and the complaints that took months to prepare and for the 40yearold building there has never been a single permit taken out until the neighbors complained about work going on and in the current permit was taken out. The neighbors filed this appeal because they had no idea what was going on. They attended a Community Meeting i believe it was on november the fifth and within a few days of attending that Community Meeting about the wireless antenna facility, the construction started. They had no choice, having received no notice, no permits and no plans, on file anywhere. And could not get any information, they had no choice but to assume that they were starting the work on th
Use that could be put into this space in the neighborhood district without a conditional use application and approval. It is not what is considered an active use under the new neighborhood commercial district rules and the purpose of the new neighborhood commercial districts and there were four of them found it out in the sunset was to create active storefronts with people coming in and out and the foot traffic that would in turn lead to more business for the surroundings area. And so, the Supervisor Office actually made to the Planning Department about the new use when we finally learned what it was. Because that complaint went to the Planning Department to the Supervisor Office and my understanding as of february eight that was not a complaint from the neighbors. And the. I do have an email from miss tang, confirming that it is the supervisors belief that this does not comply with the new neighborhood. If notice had been given to the neighbors and if they had been told what was going