Decreasing the number of ineligible ones, and this congressional compromise is evident in the statutes conflicting mandates. Evident in the mandates. It requires states to undertake programs to remove ineligible individuals but place limits on those federally mandated removal programs, including the states not removing individuals who changed residence unless they failed to respond to change notice. I know you have the exceptions clause. Would your case have been stronger without the enactment of section be . In other words, can you rely just on a and d. . If there were no b at all. Certainly, if there was no clause, thats one of the main prohibitions on which they are lying. But you have to interpret in light of the, d clearly indicates, so long as we send notice and so long as we went to federal elections, that is acceptable. So why bother . Because of the except clause. Because you have to interpret the provision in a way that reconciles with the use of failure to vote and only our
Not removing individuals who changed residence unless they failed to respond to change notice. I know you have the exceptions clause. Would your case have been stronger without the enactment of section be . In other words, can you rely just on a and d. . If there were no b at all. Certainly, if there was no clause, thats one of the main prohibitions on which they are lying. But you have to interpret in light of the, d clearly indicates, so long as we send notice and so long as we went to federal elections, that is acceptable. So why bother . Because of the except clause. Because you have to interpret the provision in a way that reconciles with the use of failure to vote and only our position interprets b in a way that allows the back and use of nonvoting and d. The act itself is a safe harbor position. That triggers confirmation. That Safe Harbor Provision doesnt rely on at all on failure to vote. It relies on post office change of address form. So isnt that some clue that safe harbor
Politics could be a wonderful topic. Its like sports. It used to be xs and os. Julie, you are right in the hearts of all of this. Some of your major product are steeped in the controversy of toxic radio, left versus right, boycotts. What is your take . Julie listen to the shows. He have absolutely been diversifying the content. Politics is an important issue, but so are the other Current Events that are happening. I really believe we have taken a much broader approach and we are certainly doing a lot of testing with a lot of other programming. Michael thank you. I have met some of the most fantastic people in this business who are clients of yours. I was the owner of a local Radio Station and i just love the smell of the turntables and the ink in the newsroom. Radio stations used to have a smell about them. Steve jones is smiling. You remember, dont you . Its like that new car smell. There is a curiosity about a hunger for and a frustration about executing more local programming for al
A ds would be derived through crowd sourcing. I went this to last numbers to reach vulnerable individuals while other calls are either blocked or forwarded to Family Member or other trusted third parties. Importantly, such blacklist and wait list can be implemented either by telephone providers themselves or their providers cooperate by making it possible i can numbers chosen third parties to that phone calls than they can be competing on who does the best job of filtering out unwanted calls. This does however require phone companies provide suitable interfaces to do that good i appreciate your richest in this topic and look forward to your questions on technology. Thank you very much, professor. Or a much appreciate your testimony. Ms. Greisman. Thank you very much chairman im a Ranking Member mccaskill members of the committee. Im delighted to discuss the ftcs spurt to fight Illegal Robocalls and im pleased to say to master next to professor schulzrinne has been a vital role of the f
John d. And catherine t. Macarthur foundation. Committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. Additional support is provided by the ford foundation, working with visionaries on the front lines of social change worldwide. The park foundation, dedicated to heightening Public Awareness of critical issues. The john and Helen Glessner family trust, supporting trustworthy journalism that informs and inspires. The heisingsimons foundation, unlocking knowledge, opportunity, and possibilities. The wyncote foundation. And by the frontline journalism fund, with major support from jon and jo ann hagler. Major support for this program is provided by the kendeda fund, investing in transformative leaders and ideas. Corporate support for frontline is provided by oooh us lives here. Where we can be surprised by others. And ourselves. The y, for a better us. President trump getting ready to take a major swipe at former president Barack Obamas legacy on Climate Change. The president s ex