Business news and analysis. Here. The policy, the players, the politics, the president s, the world. Your world. It starts now. Welcome everybody, im neil cavuto. On top of a raging bull that you saw coming. More than 3,400 days ago. What started in the midst of a meltdown has redefined the country many thought was permanently down. Out of money, out of credit. We were told, out of hope. But not. Today, we follow the green. You notice that i did not say red or blue or conservatives, or were liberals, republicans, or democrats. This is about you. How you pick yourself up and dusted yourself off. You refused to believe that the American Dream is dead. It wasnt then, it isnt now, for the next hour we will show you how it all happened. With susan lee on how we
overcame a financial crisis to become a financial powerhouse. Why so worried On Capitalism . Value investor on why he is still gung ho On Capitalism. And then came a cme chairman on all that glitters, why this Technology Terror is no
Right now the judge is reading the charges after mr. Cohen told the court, i am truly sorry and i promises to do better. He Apologize Nod country. And the defense team is asking for full consideration of mercy and telling the judge that the client came forward to offer evidence against the most p powerful man in the country not knowing the result. The prosecutors are responding forcefully and saying that powerful and privileged individuals cannot violate laws without impunity, and back with me, this tremendous panel, Danny Cevallos, Ken Delainian, and elliott and jill winebank. And jill, what do you make of what we have heard so far in this robust apology that we have heard from Michael Cohen saying that he was acting out of Blind Loyalty to donald trump. Of course, the phrase Blind Loyalty to donald trump reminds
me of the book by john dean Blind Ambition and there is some similarity between the two of them where they were basically blinded by the power of the president. But you can o
clear. he needed what he needed to do if you want to get military assistance. that is to help the president of the united states violated his oath of office. reporter: what specifically do you see as the impeachable offense? well, i think in its most naked form and says what our inquiry is going to look into the president has now admitted the notes of this call, and we don t even know if these are the complete notes of this call. it indicates the president of the united states shaking down a foreign leader, essentially undermining the national security of this country for a personal political gain, and one that violates his oath of offic office. it s very powerful evidence of that kind of potential
this now heads to the senate. this boat though today was a win for the president, who was pushing it following what his administration and most republican lawmakers are calling it big win yesterday on capitol hill. the mueller testimony is over, but the political intrigue is far from finished. president trump s team is claiming victory after yesterday s congressional hearings with the former special counsel, but the president s critics are also insisting the seven hours with the questions and sometimes answers reinforced their desires to impeach and remove the president from offic office. chief white house correspondent john roberts starts us off on the north lawn. good evening. good evening to you. the take away from the mueller hearings all depends on the political lens through which they are viewed. republicans say it s time to close the book, while many democrats say mueller is just the opening chapter. at the pentagon today, president trump presided over a ceremony to formally i
offic office. it sounds like the democrats feel this session has been going on since 9:30 this morning was productive and they were getting a lot of answers but now that they have to they want to continue this conversation on march 6th which suggests to me, manu, and i ll ask for your thoughts, that they re getting new information. they think it s fruitful, and they want to continue. that could be one way of looking at it. i was told at the beginning it was going rather slow, a lot of question about the background and not new information that had been revealed. in the first hour or so of testimony. and house members broke to have a vote. that delayed it for another hour and then republicans had their chance to question as well.