your system is politically controlled, it will be less responsive to economic needs. we have this points based system which means it easy to bring in highly skilled and highly paid people from anywhere in the world, but if you want lower skilled people to come in and work in your shops, that is more difficult and certainly more difficult and certainly more difficult than when we had freedom of movement. 50 difficult than when we had freedom of movement- of movement. so there is a trade-off- of movement. so there is a trade-off. do of movement. so there is a trade-off. do you - of movement. so there is a trade-off. do you think- of movement. so there is a trade-off. do you think the | trade off. do you think the government and others are ready to have a more open conversation about this to try to reach solutions and a better way of working perhaps? i would say two things, the government is divided on this. we saw this under liz truss. liz truss was talking about liberalising immigr
government was far less complex than it is now. yeah, but even still, as many people have frequently remarked, martha lute and luther king junior did not get famous for saying i have a complaint. nor did he get famous for saying i have a multi billeted list of ball policy proposals. i think the professionalization of, not just government, but of advocacy, of movement. both in the has meant that there is this notion that we need to sound off to the adult in the room, we need to give real detailed policy and facts and if we give fact effect effects. then people will realize that were very serious and an impeachable. when in fact, persuasion is fact neutral. you can have a deeply persuasive argument, that is star studded with fact, and you can have a persuasive argument that has none. but facts will actually never