was code for making it easier to harass people of color k this is confirmation. i would also point out that this is is a direct attack on our constitution. and on the independence of our federal judiciary. there was a lot of concern during the campaign about the fact that he attacked a judge of mexican descent. right? this was attack on the independence of federal judiciary. this is so much worse. good point. because the crime because the crime that he is being pardoned for is effectively not following the constitution because a judge determined what his officers were doing was harassment, discrimination. he refused the court s order. this is trump saying to the public, you know what, i agree, we shouldn t listen to what judges say. what do you think lawyers in the white house should do about this? quit. i wouldn t want to be a lawyer for this president.
will uphold this suspension of implementing this executive order, until there is a full hearing on the constitutionality of this executive order. why, john? two of the judges were appointed by democratic presidents. one by obama. and one by president carter. one by george w. bush. so, there s two democrats and one republican, on this three-judge panel. and i think they re going to rule in favor of suspending application of this executive order. from there, it can be appealed. it can go to the supreme court. if it s a 4-4 split, they will uphold this decision. all of this is hypothetical. we saw donald trump lashing out at the judge that issued the stay on friday. this is not if the first time that donald trump has lashed out. right. he did it during the campaign. the judge of mexican descent who
1974, nixon knew if the tapes went over, that was it. he still did it. trump has this remarkably shermanan-esque view of political combat, right? just total war. whoever happens to be in his sights at a given moment. john lewis a couple of weeks ago. it was the judge of mexican descent as mark eluded during the federal campaign and this judge today. lord knows who it s going to be in an hour. what exacerbates and makes that total war fare even more corrosive for him is whenever someone questions his legitimacy or the legitimacy of something he is doing. and i think given the presidents are full of this, that that is the give and take of the constitutional system, it s only going to get worse. that is the real concern.
house and on the secretive and irresponsible way in which it was done. to try to lay that on the constitution and the court system is just as disrespectful and disdainful as donald trump s tweet as about the so-called judge. does mark have a point here? at least least perhaps in the public relations war. we saw the first time the candidate picked a fight with the federal judge and that was the judge of mexican descent regarding his immigration plan. that did not end up so well in terms of a public relation fight for the candidate. now for the president, as this is the best fight for him to be picking calling a federal judge a so-called judge? no. it s not. i do agree with mark. the chaotic way in which the white house rolled it out
hard pressed to see van jones promoting racism. the anal joy doesn t make sense. the reason steve bannon is disturbing is because of what donald trump did. donald tru barack obama did not hire him after a birther campaign. let me finish. the problem is what steve bannon says about donald trump, the man who attacked judge of mexican descent. the man who repeatedly called elizabeth warren pocahontas. this man has done a lot of damage by fanning bigotry during the campaign. he needs to relent for that and have people come together. steve bannon you have to