looks like they viewed it. and, ta-da! paid twice as fast. oh, she s an efficient officiant. way to grow, jeanette. new. get paid twice as fast for free. visit quickbooks-dot-com. the downfall of michael flynn and the ambassador of kislyak. cnn is learning brand new details of what the russian ambassador told flynn during those same phone calls. flynn lied about to the fbi. our ryan todd reports. at least one other critical information on the russian probe not known before friday s guilty plea of michael flynn. russian ambassador of the u.s. told flynn russians are not retaliating. the ambassadors sayi says that
an in-depth conversation about anything nefarious or illegal or anything about collusion. but in fact, again, the self-inflicted wounds. he in fact did have a selected amnesia regarding his meetings. only later on did he come back to talk about the fact that he recalled even a suggestion that trump should meet putin when the media reported it. and so it s not really time to gloat or try to be dismissive or try to be satirical about the fact that he remains, frankly, a lame duck attorney general because of his contact with that particular person, and it s not time yet to laugh. yeah. jack, listen, speaking of kislyak, on russian television this week he joked about the investigation, saying his contact with americans would be too long to list. you know people who have worked with kislyak. was he mocking this whole russia investigation? no. he s just stirring up more trouble. you know, whatever comes out of
it was of a nature that was not supposed to be intended to have an in-depth conversation about anything nefarious or illegal or anything about collusion. but in fact, again, the self-inflicted wounds. he in fact did have a selected amnesia regarding his meetings. only later on did he come back to talk about the fact that he recalled even a suggestion that trump should meet putin when the media reported it. and so it s not really time to gloat or try to be dismissive or try to be satirical about the fact that he remains, frankly, a lame duck attorney general because of his contact with that particular person, and it s not time yet to laugh. yeah. jack, listen, speaking of kislyak, on russian television this week he joked about the investigation, saying his contact with americans would be too long to list. you know people who have worked with kislyak. was he mocking this whole russia investigation? no. he s just stirring up more trouble. you know, whatever comes out of
and that person, you know perceivably would not have any of the issues sessions had. you find somebody who didn t work in the campaign, wouldn t part of any of that and that person would be able to now take over the leadership of this investigation. mueller would still be the special counsel but he d be reporting to this new attorney general, and that person still has a lot of power over the investigation. mr. deer, i would imagine the big question for investigators would be how reliable is the information in the intercepts of kislyak. jo unlike in the case of michael flynn, these are russians speaking to other russians, how do they know whose telling the truth here? well, frankly i love intercepts. it s two people on the phone, they expect privacy, especially when you re talking to your boss back in months skou your not making stuff up. i always go with the intercepts
discussed trump campaign-related matters with the russian ambassadors. so if this reporting is true, have jeff sessions been misleading the american people or the people that s been asking him about his interactions with russians? it s true it would have been better had they gotten all the initial disclosures with this meeting. all we know is kislyak sent a message back to russia. they lie about these thing, embellish to through off american intelligence. we also don t know what the cob text of the meeting was. all we know is jeff sessions and somebody republicans think is a man of high integrity versus the word of a russian that no one has seen. until someone shows me jeff sessions has done something wrong i m inclined to believe in the word of jeff sessions. even though he s mislead?