they can t even figure out how to raise the debt ceiling, yet they are signing on for a bill that allows more guns everywhere, regardless of what the local law says. look, i get it, different laws make sense in different places. in louisiana, where i live now, lots and lots of people own guns. it s rarely a partisan issue in the sportsman s paradise, many kinds of people own guns for hunting and recreation, but take a place like the pittsburgh burough of homewood where officials say guns have been toxic and they need to be more controlled. again, i get it, but here s the problem. if the state s rights argument is your argument, it really starts to fall apart pretty quickly if you prioritize the power of the state over the well being of its people. take the defense of marriage act, or doma. the republican congress is all
laws. now, wasn t this supposed to be the congress of jobs, jobs, jobs? republicans haven t passed a single bill to create jobs. they can t even figure out how to raise the debt ceiling, yet they are signing on for a bill that allows more guns everywhere, regardless of what the local law says. look, i get it, different laws make sense in different places. in louisiana, where i live now, lots and lots of people own guns. it s rarely a partisan issue in the sportsman s paradise, many kinds of people own guns for hunting and recreation, but take a place like the pittsburgh burro of homewood where officials say guns have been toxic and they need to be more controlled. again, i get it, but here s the problem. if the state s rights argument is your argument, it really starts to fall apart pretty quickly if you prioritize the power of the state over the well being of its people.
regardless of the second state s laws. now, wasn t this supposed to be the congress of jobs, jobs, jobs? republicans haven t passed a single bill to create jobs. they can t even figure out how to raise the debt ceiling, yet they are signing on for a bill that allows more guns everywhere, regardless of what the local law says. look, i get it, different laws make sense in different places. in louisiana, where i live now, lots and lots of people own guns. it s rarely a partisan issue in the sportsman s paradise, many kinds of people own guns for hunting and recreation, but take a place like the pittsburgh burough of homewood where officials say guns have been toxic and they need to be more controlled. again, i get it, but here s the problem. if the state s rights argument is your argument, it really starts to fall apart pretty quickly if you prioritize the power of the state over the well being of its people.
laws. now, wasn t this supposed to be the congress of jobs, jobs, jobs? republicans haven t passed a single bill to create jobs. they can t even figure out how to raise the debt ceiling, yet they are signing on for a bill that allows more guns everywhere, regardless of what the local law says. look, i get it, different laws make sense in different places. in louisiana, where i live now, lots and lots of people own guns. it s rarely a partisan issue in the sportsman s paradise, many kinds of people own guns for hunting and recreation, but take a place like the pittsburgh burough of homewood where officials say guns have been toxic and they need to be more controlled. again, i get it, but here s the problem. if the state s rights argument is your argument, it really starts to fall apart pretty quickly if you prioritize the power of the state over the well being of its people. take the defense of marriage
they can t even figure out how to raise the debt ceiling, yet they are signing on for a bill that allows more guns everywhere, regardless of what the local law says. look, i get it, different laws make sense in different places. in louisiana, where i live now, lots and lots of people own guns. it s rarely a partisan issue in the sportsman s paradise, many kinds of people own guns for hunting and recreation, but take a place like the pittsburgh burough of homewood where officials say guns have been toxic and they need to be more controlled. again, i get it, but here s the problem. if the state s rights argument is your argument, it really starts to fall apart pretty quickly if you prioritize the power of the state over the well being of its people. take the defense of marriage act, or doma. the republican congress is all for giving states control on