this matter? i ll tellnúkto you what it h do. i appreciate you ve raised a rhetorical question. let s listen to donald trump s k,z?crimes, some of whom other republicans committed the crime of lying about who were the dually stated elector of georgia, which of course the current president president biden won. here s5n?ud donald trump talkin about georgia. you know we won georgia, just presidential election, but we that was december 2020. that was h0 zñ;b induced these people $3u1p which may or> they were trying to bring it in otherñéfstates not georgia, to e floor of the senate. i want to give you one mouwdei chance on 3é#ñthat. dg+uiu cg
no arrest asutáwz of 6:00 p.m. eastern. we know the grand jury will meet again tomorrow, so it could heat could hold a on without any major asptgy we ve cautioned througho the story, the legal process;y?o its own7ñv■ tvxár e speculation ,d■óçs(/çñ 8■ now, there were some trump now, there were some trump z,[/ujz did smattering of protests in mar-a-lago area. you could see them on the street. they took trump s side, ratherod speaker mccarthy saying this is no time for protests.r&e? everyone has the f+ñ speech trump s past demands that people > of scrutiny onmúl ix people w law enforcement especially in 2c new york are ready1ft for a.65 meanwhile, fallout from the fireworks that came out of thep
course of eight months, rend a &háhp &hc% xvór(t&háhp &hc% indict certain people. you re notdud saying she bro rrá taints rrá taints ta grandh/!ñ jurors. yg[>p furnishing:mf a , z v wrt5 ■ them that asserting the fifth you re guilty ta school course knows that s not says.wec■ then in theskvj lastdg @r(t&hz the grandçç3s as!>:ñrh1ñ@y■juro grandve0 jurors to tell a local newspaper that it wasnt÷gç almo cruel that whenk%■ people would they would go aheadm:ñ show andfñ what happened int#g! jan . no one s ever heard of that.
their fifth, obviously you can imagine we have different it x■dtznçlvqdh of this motion. t to@ñyd finali and file. we have had enough. okay. you mentioned that. let s get into the what is the evidence, some of the facts çs3 here.g foreperson speaking. the grand jury recommend an indictment of formerlubz president trump? i m not going to speak on exact indictments.pqq5eo i don 4ñ■ ■ thinkkáthat there ay giant plot twists coming.pc like, giant that s not the way i expected this to goxñ/ñx ñ all! px ñi■ for &d■anyone.-ç÷p and from your new filing, yot write throughout the r subsequent statements of additional grand jurors you write, this grand ju#o9eóñj+bk ñ improperly instructed from the
believe that barr distorted the mueller report in his four-page letter today. but i think anyone who has relied on cliff notes in high school tells you there is a big difference between the summary and actual document. so i do think the mueller report needs to come out and the democrats are well-founded in seeking that. when you go to the next layer down, which is the underlying fbi reports and evidence, that may be a bridge too far. i m not sure what basis there is. and the farther you go, the more you run into complicated problems with grand jury secrecy and executive privilege. so i m not sure that s worth the fight. what s the one thing that stands out most to you from what we have learned so far, based on barr s conclusions. the obstruction of justice conclusion surprised me. look, mueller found not enough evidence. we for beyond a reasonable doubt. talking about a criminal standard. not enough evidence for coordination or conspiracy charges. he clearly found more evidence o