and that will not be until the judge starts talking. our correspondent. at the moment, no cameras. when the camera feed doesn t switch on, we will cut straight to it, we doing, talking about, so we don t miss it. but because judith is about, so we don t miss it. but becausejudith is inside, she is feeding us some details about what is happening. in a courtroom number one, she says, waiting for the hearing to begin. olivia s family are here, she says they are wearing pink in her memory. cheryl is holding a memory teddy bear, with fabric from olivia s pyjamas. a certain amount of emotion there already. the court room is extremely quiet, dude is going on to say, live your s family, the prosecute barristers, for example, all in position, but as of a couple of moments ago, thomas cashman is yet to appear in the dock. the defence team not in court yet. it is the latest from inside the courtroom, judith morris is there. that is on a life page as well. life page. i will keep th
new. in england and wales, that is. we can pick apart what will happen there, we can talk to daniel stanford, he was standing by for us. good to see you, daniel. talk us through the history of cameras in courtrooms. in through the history of cameras in courtroom- through the history of cameras in courtrooms. . ., . ., , courtrooms. in england and wales, we are stilljust courtrooms. in england and wales, we are stilljust dipping courtrooms. in england and wales, we are stilljust dipping our courtrooms. in england and wales, we are stilljust dipping our toes - courtrooms. in england and wales, we are stilljust dipping our toes in - are stilljust dipping our toes in the water of the cameras in court, compared to other countries, but you will remember in 1984, the case of 0j will remember in 1984, the case of oj simpson in a trial that on trial for murder. it was a huge spectacle, watched at great length, notjust in america, but all around the world. 1994. america, but all around t
indicates that she regards his actions as disrespectful to the court and the sentencing hearing will go ahead in his absence. cashman s family have also not turned up today, but we have been told that david mclachlan, casey, who was the case you prosecuted the case against thomas cashman, has been speaking for the prosecution and submitted that the minimum sentence should be a starting point of the 30 years. that is what the sentencing guidelines say for an aduu sentencing guidelines say for an adult were firearm is used in a murder case, 30 years as a start. the prussian dismay prosecution is starting to outline their case for the lines that the prosecution that the lines that the prosecution that the team take. thomas cashman is 34, so even if he gets years 30 and a minimum, that means he could still be in prison until his mid 605. thank you very much. just give us an idea of timing, if you have them? are no is a difficult question, but the delays that you have already
policy here, as they started to consider whether or not we ought to go down the route of cameras in court, and it was really what set the framework for what came over the next few years. the framework for what came over the next few veere next few years. fascinating. what do ou make next few years. fascinating. what do you make of next few years. fascinating. what do you make of this next few years. fascinating. what do you make of this case, next few years. fascinating. what do you make of this case, where - next few years. fascinating. what do you make of this case, where we - next few years. fascinating. what do you make of this case, where we are | you make of this case, where we are now, daniel? with because making a decision thatjudge can of course be viewed in this instance. what viewed in this instance. what happened viewed in this instance. what happened next, viewed in this instance. what happened next, after- viewed in this instance. what happened next, after the