his campaign knows he lost. his administration knows he lost. and nevertheless, he tells the country, i won. we have much more evidence to show the american people on this point than we can reasonably show in one hearing. and today, we will begin. tonight, new testimony from the very top of trump s own campaign team, that his claims of election fraud were just lies. but they were proposing, that was nuts. the mayor was definitely intoxicated. law firms were not comfortable making the arguments that rudy giuliani was making publicly. evidence today that former president trump knew he lost, and kept telling lies about it. the president accepted that. he said, okay, fine, but what about the others? i told them that it was it was crazy stuff, and i was doing great, doing service for the country. and why the investigation now involves fundraising off claims that were notably false? not only was there the big lie, it was the big rip off. tonight, committee mem
presidential election, warning them that they may be victims of a disinformation campaign and it may be about hunter and joe biden because and that ended up with the new york post story being censored. yeah. listen, that is a great question. it s one of the unanswered questions at the attorney generals of louisiana and missouri are trying to get to the bottom . it s one of the questions that the weaponization subcommittee that jim jordan s methodically getting these bombshell interviews done is getting to the bottom of it s something that james comey is trying to figure out. and the house oversight committee there is a disconnect. i know. listen, we know three things. we know that there was authentication this spring and that a witness was then questioned about some of the emails by the fbi because they knew them to be authentic and they were asking for his help understanding it. in the fall, when dni radclyffe goes public and says, hey, there is no evidence that this is a russian
them had any knowledge at all to make those statements? we know from the director of national intelligence and i know from my reporting inside the fbi that by early, middle of 2020, early spring to mid spring of 2020, the fbi corroborated, this was anna then particular laptop. they were using it, documentation, exploitation to drive the hunter biden investigation. the fbi knew it wasn t a russian disinformation. they had the laptop, authenticated it. separately, we know from dni ratcliffe there was no intelligence whatsoever between september and november suggesting the laptop was a russian disinformation. i interviewed several of the 51 who signed it who said some of them had classified security clearances still, none of them, none of them knew of anything. they just thought they could sign the letter saying looks like something that could be. and with that, created one of the greatest political dirty tricks in american history.
that the kind of work that was being done in wuhan scares him to death as a scientist. they were taking viruss that were contagious and making them more transmissible. so they were doing viral gain of function studies of deadly virus that s had a morbidity rate of 10, 20% as well. doing those in a lab. march that you showed at top of your show, the house republicans were holding their own hearing on the origins of covid-19 with former dni ratcliffe. the chinese embassy sent a letter to the republicans basically saying back off. republicans didn t take to that letter well. take a listen to this. the chinese embassy expresses grave concern regarding this hearing and states that they
with any level of confidence is that a virus which killed over a million americans originated in a chinese lab whose research included work for the chinese military and such an assessment would obviously have enormous geopolitical implications that i believe the current administration does not want to face head on. will: so what does ratcliffe mean by that? that s pretty forget where covid originated. the last sense is what i m fascinated by. dni ratcliffe is here with us tonight. will: can you pick up on the last sentence? what are the serious geeio political implications that the biden administration does not want to face when facing the reality that covid came from a lab? consequence sequences of our intelligence community making assessment at any intelligence level across the board that the