muse mauz hello, and thank you so much for joining us i m ana cabrera reporting from new york. this morning divided they fall, the republican party grappling with whether to go all in on trump or break away after his historic indictment. we ll have a live report from capitol hill and break down the new reporting about his legal troubles. plus, extreme weather battering the south. we re talking 5 inch diameter hail, and rare june tornados in the southeast leaving thousands without electricity, while houston s implementing an emergency plan to help residents deal with triple digit temperatures. we re looking at approximately ten days of over 100 degrees, and you know, with record breaking days as well. and later, an indictment for danny wenny. the this-year-old marine veteran is facing a second degree manslaughter charge for putting jordan neely in a deadly chokehold last month. and we re keeping a close eye on the supreme court with a handful of working days left,
The Supreme Court recently upheld the conviction in a murder case observing that the ocular evidence given by the eye witness can t be discredited merely because the expert opinion supplied by the.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside a conviction under section 304 of the IPC upon finding that the trial court overlooked the glaring inconsistencies between the ocular/eyewitness testimony.
getting the public to think about other things as opposed to everyone focusing on the victim, i.e., mr. neely. this is their shot of doing that. i do not think this is the right way to do it. and i don t necessarily know that it s going to be a positive thing for mr. penny long-term, but he said it was approved by his attorneys and we ll have to see what happens. and charles, how important is video evidence, surveillance videos, witness videos when it comes to this case? in a case like this, it s extremely important, depending on how many eyewitnesses are going to come forward. we know that in eyewitness accounts of identification, which is not at issue here, those things are very unreliable. from the perspective of other people, other strap hangers who were on the subway, who were watching everything go down, that s going to be in a very important conversation in the absence of ocular evidence. now that we have this ocular evidence, the public is going to weigh in, and they re goi
While dismissing the appeal pleas of two murder convicts, the Supreme Court of India reiterated certain important principles on the appreciation of oral evidence of injured eye witnesses during the.