can proceed from here with a new view of the way you would govern. i think he tried in her book and i just don t think it was a sincere enough effort to explain that vote in any convincing way. there were actually two votes that day in october of 2002 the 11 amendment, which the levin amendment. so it s going to be very difficult for her to explain her vote against the levin amendment and second war, the iraq war authorization. to the present and future what foreign policy disagreements do you have with hillary clinton now, if any? well it s a whole approach to our place in the world. at this moment when we so-called won the cold war, the berlin
that vote in any convincing way. there were actually two votes that day in october of 2002, the 11 the levin amendment. so it s going to be very difficult for her to explain her vote against the levin amendment and second war, the iraq war authorization. to the present and future, what foreign policy disagreements do you have with hillary clinton now, if any? well, it s a whole approach to our place in the world. at this moment when we so-called won the cold war, the berlin wall came down, the soviet union broke up, we were seen as the sole superpower and at that time we had a responsibility to act very humbly as the sole superpower, to exercise that place in history very
in october of 2002, michael bryant went on trial for malice, murder, arson and burglary. in this case, it was premeditated. it was planned. it was schemed, he took the day off work and he planned this murder. it started out to be just a little small transaction deal, of a person selling a house with not going through a real estate agent. you know? friends at work. still blows my mind every time i think about it. michael bryant was convicted and sentenced to life in prison, plus 40 years. this was one of the most interesting cases that i ever worked on. when i heard the verdict, i was speechless. reached over and hugged my wife and just shed a few tears. nothing to say but thank god, they got him. without forensics we would have not convicted michael bryant.
another thing to keep in mind, wolf, is there will be members of congress particularly from the president s own party who will demand this president consult with congress and seek authorization from congress before delivering any air strikes against iraq. obviously all of this is irony layered on top of irony. the president was very much an anti-war critic running for president. a big part of the reason why he became president. he ended the war nearly three years ago. keep in mind, wolf, i think this is important. the authorization to use military force in iraq that was passed by the congress in october of 2002, that has not yet expired. and some have suggested that perhaps the president could use that as a legal basis to conduct air strikes over the next several days. he would not need to go back to congress and seek authorization. so a lot of moving parts. a lot of moving pieces for this president. no question about it. a huge political moment for this president. a president who said
insurance policy arthel neville in our new york city newsroom with the latest. reporter: jenna, that s right. his fate is in the hand of jurors. life in in prison is what 42-year-old michelle oscado. he represented himself for most of the trial but shocked the courtroom to bring in standby counsel to deliver closing arguments. it s a last minute twist in a murder trial nothing short of dramatic, including the time the judge threw him in jail for 30 days of contempt of court after he threatened a witness for the prosecution. but the defense turned the table yesterday, claiming the state exaggerated and overdramatized the evidence, during quote, viliification of escoto. 20 witnesses testified and hundred of pieces of evidence were introduced into the courtroom. in october of 2002, 21-year-old wendy tripago was murdered. for four days she was escoto s