unusual press conference about ending the inquiry into hillary clinton s e-mail server. he acknowledged that the fbi did not normally make public its recommendations to prosecutors to bring criminal charges, but added given the importance of the matter, i think unusual transparency is in order. he then went on to editorialize while secretary clinton and her colleagues had not intended to violate any laws they were, quote, extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly-classified information. blasting the subject of a criminal probe who is not being indicted, highly unusual. then october 28, 11 days before the election, and when early voting was well underway across the country, comey revealed to the congress, knowing it would be revealed in the public domain, that he had re-opened the hillary investigation because of anthony weiner s laptop. again, highly unusual. why did he do it? it seems that comey, like many, was placing a bit too much stock in the prognostications
defense counsel an prosecutor. i want to get to comey. i want to go cuss on. we re not just saying hillary clinton this, huma abedin that. chris farrell says maybe there ought to be a criminal investigation of james comby. a little i said in the open, october 28, 11 days before the election, james comey does something that really hurt hillary clinton politcally and says, we found e-mails that are possibly pertinent to her server probe. in fair sness to her, donald trump goes on the campaign trail and says this is corrupt ocean a scale we ve never seen before. i looked at the time line, november 6, comey comes back out, right before the election, we looked at the laptop, it s complete, that damaged hillary clinton. no question it damaged her. peep km call it whining after the fact but the facts are clear in polling. the internal campaign following have polling was clear she dropped right when she started that and continued to drop until she came out again. it was, the notion that he
defense counsel an prosecutor. i want to get to comey. i want to go cuss on. we re not just saying hillary clinton this, huma abedin that. chris farrell says maybe there ought to be a criminal investigation of james comby. a little i said in the open, october 28, 11 days before the election, james comey does something that really hurt hillary clinton politcally and says, we found e-mails that are possibly pertinent to her server probe. in fair sness to her, donald trump goes on the campaign trail and says this is corrupt ocean a scale we ve never seen before. i looked at the time line, november 6, comey comes back out, right before the election, we looked at the laptop, it s complete, that damaged hillary clinton. no question it damaged her. peep km call it whining after the fact but the facts are clear in polling. the internal campaign following have polling was clear she dropped right when she started that and continued to drop until she came out again. it was, the notion that he
secretary clinton and her colleagues had not intended to violate any laws, they were extremely care unless their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. blasting the subject of a criminal probe who is not being indicted highly unusual. then october 28, 11 days before the election and when early voting was well under way across the country, comey revealed to the congress, knowing it would be revealed in the public domain, that he had reopened the hillary investigation because of anthony weiner s laptop. again, highly unusual. why did he do it? it seems that comey, like many, was placing a bit too much stock in the prognostications of nate silver and others believing hillary was about to be elected and not wanting anyone to believe he d kept the matter silent so as to protect his future boss. especially where donald trump was claiming the election was rigged. so by reporting to congress on the reopening of the probe, he