take a look at that graph there and you ll see there s a slight difference in the time those polls were taken. instead of looking october 94 and october 2010 numbers for obama and clinton let s look back to march and those particular cycles and there is it on the screen right there. so what are you saying? if you look at those numbers you ll see obama and clinton are running well ahead at that point in their terms. he s a weak president, his approval ratings is low, so let s see when we get to october if he s at that point comparable to both obama and clinton. right now he s running behind their particular points in their presidency. your latest column from the washington post says tax cuts were supposed to save the gop from trump, oops. you point out that shows just 27% of americans think the tax plan was a good idea. and republicans say let s talk
in october 2010, the u.s. government authorized russia to purchase uranium one, which controls 20% of the u.s. uranium talk about a bizarre connection in the first place. here is clinton she was on that board, and only four months before this decision was made, bill clinton got half a million dollars for a speech in russia, guess who paid for that speech? renaissance capital, an entity made of foreign russian intelligence officers who were touting the stock uranium one. pete: victoria toensing on the program in november. she is a lawyer for the whistle blower on the uranium one case as well. we will bring in sara carter investigative journalist all over. this we learned of indictment uranium one case executive charged with bribe ago russian official. what do you know and what does it mean. mark lambert. he s 54 years old. after he left transportation logistics international,
within this russian company was directly related to the decision to sell to let these corrupt russians buy the uranium company. then years later people involved in that were prosecuted but the u.s. government knew all about this in 2009 and 2010. they also knew, because my client turned it over, all the information about how the russians wanted to dominate the world market in uranium. he was providing memos and memos to them about how this was putin s aim. now, how could the u.s. government in october 2010 say okay, we re going to allow all this corrupt russian company to buy this uranium company. sandra: your client also engaged in conversations with russian colleagues about efforts of the washington entity and others to gain influence with the clintons and the obama administration. that s correct.
morning on your client? i spent last week with him and i went over many of these thousands of pages of documents. you can imagine it is a big pile. and also my client provided oral briefings to the f.b.i. starting somewhat in 2008 but really getting into it in 2009. over the period of six years. what s important are the timing before october 2010. during that time period, the u.s. government heard two issues from my client. the first issue was the pervasive corruption within the russian uranium industry and trust me, it s only one industry. it reports to the kremlin and to putin. there are not diverse companies as the press has falsely reported. sandra: i want to talk about this tape, this audio tape that apparently exists with hard evidence of what was going on.
steve: the attorney general grilled on capitol hill with calls from congressman to appoint a special counsel for the uranium one deal the key to unraveling its mystery might be with an unnamed fbi informant. ? everything i have been proffered, he has evidence of illegal conduct 2009 and 2010 before this deal was agreed to involving uranium one. it was all connected. steve: all connected. will this informant get us to the bottom of the uranium one deal? joining us now is the attorney for the fbi informant, victoria tensing. good morning to you, victor yanchts good morning, steve. steve: this guy has evidence that the russians were paying bribes? let me lay out the basic facts of the uranium one for you. in october 2010, the u.s. government authorized russia to purchase uranium one, which controls 20% of the u.s. uranium. a bizarre decision in the first place. but then there is my client who was working undercover