our borders are wide open to millions of foreigners who seek entry into the country. the democrat party is responsible for most of this. and much more. it seeks to control our governmental institutions. justs it dominates our cultural entires from media that ac academia and entertainment and science, and seeks to eviscerate the constitution. separation of powers and so forth. obstructs if ideological designs and abuses rule of law by targets its political opens for harassment, investigation, prosecution, and impris imprisonment.
our borders are wide open to millions of foreigners who seek entry into the country. the democrat party is responsible for most of this. and much more. it seeks to control our governmental institutions. justs it dominates our cultural entires from media that ac academia and entertainment and science, and seeks to eviscerate the constitution. separation of powers and so forth. obstructs if ideological designs and abuses rule of law by targets its political opens for harassment, investigation, prosecution, and impris imprisonment.
MyJournals.org - Science - Non-disclosure of developmental neurotoxicity studies obstructs the safety assessment of pesticides in the European Union (Environmental Health)
and how many are fake. when i looked closely at the losses from the 1990s and the 2000s, they look inflated. this is not lawful application of the law. this is not depreciation. this is aggressive tax avoidance by somebody who fights with the irs. obstructs and delays. unfortunately, the irs is not a good match for president trump or many rich people. when you, i mean, given your knowledge base, given your studying and research of the former president s taxes leading up to this period of time, what did you see in here that surprised was there anything you saw that surprised you that you fell felt like that was new from the new york times investigation or other leaks over the years? well, just seeing the numbers, the new york times s reports stopped at 2017. going through 2020, the story
trump s supreme dereliction of duty during those 187 minutes, and mr. meadows testimony will bear on another key question before this committee. did donald trump through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede congress s official proceedings to count electoral votes. cheney was suggesting deliberately for the first time that trump might have committed a felony, and the language she carefully used and later repeated pointed to a specific section of the criminal code under section 1512 of title 18. that says whoever obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding or attempts to do so shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not more than 20 years or both. a year later, the january 6th committee is ready to present its conclusions. that will happen next week. on monday, the panel is expected to meet and consider issuing