once that question was satisfied, i think the majority of americans went back to work the next day and said, okay, back to what we ve got to get done for the country. the obstruction story is much thinner piece of the pie and only democratic activists really care. i don t think so, i think people care about the rule of law and whether or not the president feels he is bound by the rule of law or is above the rule of law. therefore i think the obstruction presented in the report is very important. you will hear a lot about them tomorrow. harris: if they were evidence of the crime, which in the report, the way i understood it, there was no evidence of crime. if there were, let s just pretend i guess, what are we doing now? are we making up stuff on behalf of by mueller, i m not sure where you go with this if we already know some of the answers. we have a general belief in america they were innocent until proven guilty. mueller felt strong enough to say there is zero evidence of
and the american public is not standing for it. their whole focus is on 20/20 . trying to demean the public and party and demean the president of the united states, they want to demean so much where they want to get him out of office anyway we can. you would want gentlemen, congressman greene who sounds like a real beauty, he said the only way we will beat him is to impeach him. how about that? dan: joining us now is a charlie hurt, the former economic advisor austan goolsbee and lisa boothe. i will go to you first. when will they admit and come clean that the spying happened and give up on this obstruction story? at some point you have to take the loss. i don t think they were going to. the entire aim has been to try to create this illusion of smoke so that people think there is a fire there. there has never been a fire and
standing fortheir whole focus in party and demean the president of the united states, they wantd to demean so much where they want to get him out of office anyway we can. you would one gentlemen, congressman greene who sounds like a real beauty, he said the only way we will beat him is to impeach him. how about that? dan: joining us now is a charlie hurt, the former economic advisor, austan goolsbee and lisa boothe. i will go to you first. when will they admit and come clean that the spying happened and give up on this obstruction story? at some point you have to take the loss. i don t think they were going to. what have we seen from the democrats? the entire aim has been to try to create this illusion of smoke so that people think there is a fire there. there has never been a fire and
the conduct. i guess there are different ways to do that. but i, like many, and am increasingly saying the only way i can see to do it when you have this kind of an attorney general is to have impeachment hearings. you don t have to impeach him, but have the hearings because you need that weapon, that tool to get the information to the american public. you can have those hearings. i don t think you have to call them impeachment hearings, but you can bring up others to talk about trump dealing secretly with russia while campaigning. you can bring in michael flynn to talk about obstruction. you ve got rick gates. this is what the democrats have not done yet. how did watergate become the big story? they could start telling the obstruction story and the russian story this way. they need to make it a
doesn t always tell them whether they came over with their parents. the biggest problem is they don t know what happened to these children because they weren t identified as such when they came into the system. it s a mess. so, julia, is there some sense of a coverup that when this story blew up and reporters like you started digging into it and shining a light on what was happening on the border that they knew they had a problem and deflated the numbers in some way? it is true that reporters for some time were asking about this uptick. we heard more children were being separated than previously. there were some separations that even occurred under obama but that was if a parent posed a real risk to a child. but we knew there was an uptick and starred asking questions and didn t get a lot of aunnswers. nbc reported there was a pilot program in el paso before they