america first. and she went on and on about, this is undermining the american right to vote. and the importance of that is i think what professor feldman said, which is a key issue here for i think americans is, why impeachment, why do we need to do this when mr. there is an election coming up. and professor feldman was poignant in saying that exact debate was the debate had in deciding what to put into the constitution, that if you have a president who is actually going to undermine the upcoming election, you have nothing to do but impeach him and you need to have a way of preventing the person who is in office from corrupting the office. those were the two most powerful points from the hearing today. maya wily. i completely agree with andrew. i would add, to the point about obstructi obstruction, to the debate with professor turley who is saying
into potentially two articles of impeachment when we get down that line here. the actual actions of the white house regarding ukraine, withholding of the aid, the conditioning of white house meeting, those two sort of quid pro quos, not to go back to speaking latin here then the obstructi obstruction. all of this laid out in a 300 page report that s 150 pages of content and another 150 pages of notes. so democrats showing their work here as we go through this and to be frank with you, i m just beginning to dig into this. it s a pretty dense almost academic document here and i think i can just say that that also speaks to why democrats found those public hearings so important. we learned this if mueller. americans, by and large, are not going to sit down tonight and read a 300 page report, but they ll watch these hearings, they ll listen to these witnesses and democrats hope that will keep them in line in supporting this inquiry. they re laying out their argument here and what i ve
them to testify in places where there won t be media stake outs. the documents showed they were giving them a heads up press stories. and even peter strzok gets fed up with the gamesmanship. he notes that they get two laptops where they have the 60,000 emails or what used to be the 60,000 emails because half of them were deleted. it s interesting we are getting them now. this is in-your-face obstructi obstruction. at the same time, you have to remember that while they are taking care of the hillary clinton they are working with her campaign and bending over backwards later ine year. you ve got fbi lawyers it looks like authoring documents a target trim. what an outrage. it s one more piece of evidence that would in my view to reopen the criminal investigation into this whole issue. jason: look at part of the
them to testify in places where there won t be media stake outs. the documents showed they were giving them a heads up press stories. and even peter strzok gets fed up with the gamesmanship. he notes that they get two laptops where they have the 60,000 emails or what used to be the 60,000 emails because half of them were deleted. it s interesting we are getting them now. this is in-your-face obstructi obstruction. at the same time, you have to remember that while they are taking care of the hillary clinton they are working with her campaign and bending over backwards later ine year. you ve got fbi lawyers it looks like authoring documents a target trim. what an outrage. it s one more piece of evidence that would in my view to reopen the criminal investigation into this whole issue. jason: look at part of the
obstructi obstruction, right, this would then also go to william barr. we know he s the sort of mitch mcconnell of the justice department, where he s the grim reaper for anything that might hurt donald trump. i wonder if for him, the threat of potentially being john mitchell, of potentially being prosecuted, if, in fact, the democrat becomes the next president of the united states and there s a real attorney general in place, rather than what he whatever it is that he considers himself to be whether then that becomes an incentive for him to behave any differently. yeah, once upon a time, i would have thought yes, but he has made it clear that he doesn t care about his legacy. we re all going to die some time, and he seems to be bent on pushing president trump s agenda. some things that have been very surprising to me about his role is his personal travel overseas to try to gather evidence to undermine the origins of the russia investigation, this narrowing of the referral to the