everybody else did. and according to jarecki, the filmmakers had given evidence to the authorities two years before the show aired. which, to bob s attorney dick deguerin, meant the show was far from objective reporting. they edited probably 50 or more hours down into a few minutes. and i think the editing job was designed to make him look bad. reporter: but it was a simple comparison of handwriting samples that, on it s own, seemed to condemn robert durst. it was episode five of the jinx series, in which a letter he admitted sending to susan berman was compared to the infamous cadaver note her presumed killer sent the cops. soon after seeing that episode, bob packed up and left houston. but the cops were monitoring his cell phone and eventually tracked him to the jw marriott hotel in new orleans. so, now, two f.b.i. agents show up at the hotel and they re
but what about everyone else who carried his water and have never really apologized? i m not saying they should be fired or anything, but shouldn t someone admit we went along with the hoax? yeah. maybe they could hold back a little on social media in particular. i think that, especially in the smollett case, that was were too many sort of journalists,he writers, pundits, whatever you want to call them, learned the line between objective reporting and sort of advocacy. that s where you see kind of the activist corner. the things that they are tweeting aren t being approved by editors, so they are not as cautious. they re not as calculating as their story. social media has maybe allowed too many journalists to kind of let the mask slip and it determined that they have these deep-seated biases that often go unchallenged and that that has contributed to a loss of faith in them. perhaps deservedly. tucker: really quick, do you think the next time zone
jussie smollett seems like an imbalanced character. what about all the figures that carried his water and never really apologized? i m not saying they should be fired or anything, but shouldn t someone admit, we went along with the hoax? and maybe they could hold back a little bit on social media in particular. i think that especially in the smollett case more than their reporting. that was where too many journalists, writers, pundits blurred the line between objective reporting and sort of advocacy. that s where you see the media in the activist corner. obviously the things they re tweeting aren t being approved by editors. they re not as cautious and calculating as their stories. i think social media has maybe allowed too many a journalist let the map flip and reveal they have these deep seeded biases that often go unchallenged and has contributed to a loss of
the show aired. which, to bob s attorney dick deguerin, meant the show was far from objective reporting. they edited probably 50 or more hours down into a few minutes. and i think the editing job was designed to make him look bad. reporter: but it was a simple comparison of handwriting samples that, on it s own, seemed to condemn robert durst. it was episode five of the jinx series, in which a letter he admitted sending to susan berman was compared to the infamous cadaver note her presumed killer sent the cops. soon after seeing that episode, bob packed up and left houston. but the cops were monitoring his cell phone and eventually tracked him to the jw marriott hotel in new orleans. so, now, two f.b.i. agents show up at the hotel and they re talking to the clerk. well, do you have anyone booked
the democrats are not substance the engaged in problem solving on the issue at the border. but still the media continues to carry the water for them. but when reporters begin acting like pundits, kellyanne conway showed us yesterday exactly how they should be treated. can you promise that the president will tell the truth tonight? will he tell the truth? yes, can you promise that you will? the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you god. make sure that goes viral. this is why i m one of the only people around here who even gives you the time of day. let me get back in your face because you re such a [bleep] i know you want this to go viral. a lot of these people don t like you. let me be respectful to the media writ large as i always on. i explained that it with alternative information and additional facts makes planet many times. don t you put her back in my face for all the questions your network needs to issue. laura: she said smart ass.