from this what they hear. this issue is closed, that issue is closed. there are a lot of open questions still and it may not involve the president today. and to be clear we should be fair. comey said that when he left the job, there weren t open investigations of the president. that is key. but if the dossier question is opened, if compromising information is open, if trump team collusion is still open, there are things that could touch the president that are still open questions. that s exactly right. the open investigation f he wasn t aware of one at the time he was fired, certainly that raises the interest level of saying well, maybe that was part of the now investigation as to why trump was so adamant about having him no longer in office. what this did for comey is reiterate i think what s going to raise some pretty fair criticism once again which is he s so interested in being the last sign of defense for the credibility of the fbi and inherently himself that i think at times it
liberal arts education had reinforced the idea that freedom was indeed a fragile thing. the context is you gave a speech two days after september 11 to the entirety of the nsa. and i think what you were saying is our object activity, we intel professionals, our object jek activity is being challenging, is he challenging the object jek activity of the entire intelligence community. he is rejecting judgments from the art and craft of intelligence, we believe to be objective judgments. i will be the first to admit, sometimes, occasionally they aren t correct judgments, i get that. this is very hard work. but the criticism of the intelligence community s judgments on this issue have been that the community is incompetent and politic sized and prejudice. that is simply not right. i think the dynamic we have here is we have a president-elect who has been able throughout the