put their plan back up for a vote, either every three years or if material changes i think in this case, not putting it up from the vote with the revised targets is an issue from a governance perspective. however, i do not think that that kind of necessitates shareholders directing operational strategies of the board, if that makes sense. it does. what do you say to those campaigners who say that you are only concerned, you and your clients, with helping the company and shareholders in the short term, and shareholders in the short term, and actually, bp made more than £27 billion last year, and it is backsliding on its commitments, and it is yourjob to hold their feet to the fire? it it is your “ob to hold their feet to the fire? , w ., , it is your “ob to hold their feet to the fire? , . , , the fire? it is actually the board s “ob the fire? it is actually the board s job to ensure the fire? it is actually the board s job to ensure that the fire? it is actually t
put their plan back up for a vote, either every three years or if material changes i think in this case, not putting it up from the vote with the revised targets is an issue from a governance perspective. however, i do not think that that kind of necessitates shareholders directing operational strategies of the board, if that makes sense. it does. what do you say to those campaigners who say that you are only concerned, you and your clients, with helping the company and shareholders in the short term, and shareholders in the short term, and actually, bp made more than £27 billion last year, and it is backsliding on its commitments, and it is yourjob to hold their feet to the fire? it it is your “ob to hold their feet to the fire? , w ., , it is your “ob to hold their feet to the fire? , . , , the fire? it is actually the board s “ob the fire? it is actually the board s job to ensure the fire? it is actually the board s job to ensure that the fire? it is actually the board s