shown this week, all of the new footage that we ve never seen before. and? and you would be shocked, alex, that s how little time that takes [laughter] you would be, uhm i m going to be right here! it s right in the middle of what i have to say here, but i just want to give it away right here. the entirety, the entirety of the new video that we ve never seen before, attacker caution has shown, is less than four minutes. [laughter] less than four minutes. i do the work! i do the hard worker watching at. all you do the big left for all of us! watch all of it! in fact i water more than once. just [laughter] just to be sure. yeah, four minutes! okay lawrence, i m going to learn about what was in those precious four minutes on your television program this evening. yeah we ll all over more to say about. it i m sure you do. thank you. alex have greater! thank you. on january six, late tonight, after they trump violent mob attacked the capitol, tucker carlso
good evening alex! i spent my day today watching all of the january 6th footage that tucker carlson has shown this week, all of the new footage that we ve never seen before. and? and you would be shocked, alex, that s how little time that takes [laughter] you would be, uhm i m going to be right here! it s right in the middle of what i have to say here, but i just want to give it away right here. the entirety, the entirety of the new video that we ve never seen before, attacker caution has shown, is less than four minutes. [laughter] less than four minutes. i do the work! i do the hard worker watching at all. you do the big left for all of us! watch all of it! in fact i water more than once. just [laughter] just to be sure. yeah, four minutes! okay lawrence, i m going to learn about what was in those precious four minutes on your television program this evening. yeah we ll all over more to say about it. i m sure you do. thank you alex. have gr
a whole series of questions that the public is entitled to know. it was disheartening to hear the fbi director dodge and he kept using the phrase, i don t want to get out ahead of the justice department on this. and i was wondering what he was intentionally or not implying? is it that the justice department might be doing something else public soon about this? that is possible but let s get real. he is the one who is under oath being asked questions by congress. it is not bad for the justice department to understand that when people go up there for a hearing, they are going to have to answer questions. they may be expecting to do things on their own timeline,
president clinton. this was 1999. let s play it. i am concerned about a president under oath being alleged to have committed perjury. i hope he can rebut that and prove that did not happen. he can show he did not commit obstruction of justice and he can complete his term. but there are serious allegations that that occurred. and in america, in supreme court and the american believe no one is above the law. and the president has gotten himself into this fix that is very serious. i intend to give him an absolutely fair trial. i mean, listen, there s a tweet and a sound bite for everything. and that one s back from the tv time machine from 1999. so is sessions right, presidents can obstruct justice? yes, the president can obstruct justice and he s not above the law. and any notion to the contrary is absolutely ludicrous. and here s why.
president under oath being alleged to have committed perjury. i hope he can rebut that and prove that did not happen. if he can show he did not commit obstruction of justice and he can complete his term. but there are serious allegations that that occurred. and in america, in supreme court tanld american people believe no one is above the law. and the president has gotten himself into this fix that is very serious. i intend to give him an absolutely fair trial. i mean, listen, there s a tweet and a sound bite for everything. and that one s back from the tv time machine from 1999. so is sessions right, presidents can obstruct justice? yes, the president can obstruct justice and he s not above the law. and any notion to the contrary is absolutely ludicrous. and it s not legally persuasive at all and here s why. people talk about article ii and