they know thagt as longwill as they re all wearing the same uniform, they ll probably be okay. this is whiny you ll see one person in brookline or bethesda raise the ukrainian flagn th in the yard and the veo next day everybody on the street will have one tocy suddenly. it s an entire neighborhood of s foreign policy experts, all specializing in eastern european border disputes. is amaz it s amazing. just last year, these very same people were all eminent virologists, every one of themst with passionate views. on the details of pandemicothe management. thir words not s is , in othn not a movement of rugged t individuals. this is a parthey based on the idea of the group, the bureaucracy, the blotyb. lev it s the party of weak, fearfule people who are huddled togetheri for collective power.ys w when the democratic partye speaks, it is always with one voice, often in a north korean accent. y one thing the party often speaks about is gun control. the right no american has
washington for many years and they drillth one thing into your head over and over and over again. thou shalt not use campaign, pr funds for a personal, private, familiar or business matter. ree you shall not. it i is the red line ine im washington. the imperialpe prosecutor. i only know people appreciaten this in manhattan.s whol his whole case is that donald trump was obligated under federal law to use campaign funds to settle a private0,000 dispute, turning all oamfe poli campaign law for three hundredti million americans and their whole political system on its head. it is such a brazen perversion violation, subversion of federal law. it s astonishing., it s been allowed to go on thisi far , particularly because a local d.a. in manhattan who won his primary with eighty thousand not ha votes does not have entie authority to rewrite federal unit the entirer united states of america. and now he s saying he s even willing to defy the subpoena from jim jordan. r an james comey and brian s
for muscle cramps and spasms. thera works. relief works fast, so get back at it there. works, works, for fast muscle relief. therrell works, works available in stores everywhere.erm iq the term iq stands for intelligence quotient. the idea is controversial for o some reason, like it some racist crackpot thing. but it s not. it s a feature of sociald ha sciencs be lon e and has been for a long time. it s an imperfect measurement, but best it s thee we have the best way to measureh someone s reasoning and problem solving. iner abilities. and there is a correlation that has been shown in research for well, again, aee one hundred years between iq and family income, socioeconomi c status, school and work performance, law abiding. this health habits, even some moral qualities. who knows why ? so it has never been controversial to think that having a high iq country is a good thing. it s good for individuals, it yu is good for society. it s noth , again, a measure of
three committee chairmen in congress, even in the law,l i don t. do but even if that d.a. went e to harvard, he still can t dn oe that, even if even he wentrd to harvard, yale, princetong hee and stanford, he couldn t dou ta it. let s be verlkeduty clear aboutr what s happening here. and you ve talked about itli is we are now living in a post progtitution, post truth era, where progressive soros backedee prosecutors will decide for themselves who is free a and whe is not, who goes to jail and who does it, who can speak d freely, who cannot speak freely, who is allowed to exist and do business in this. and country, and who must be crushed into the earth and ultimately destroyed. and if we allow if we allow our legal system to become weaponizes wea in this way, then all of our freedoms exist solely on the sufferance of whichever prosecutor is in charge. wherever we livr prosecutore i think every word that youud just said is true. is truethe principles here aree foundational and hav
sexual preferences. but it really does highlight that the abida administration, whoeveenhoeverr is actually run, is putting up activists masquerading as judges, becauser the whole point is to get more votes to rubber stampan the left s social and politicalk agenda. but evener more so, tucker, .oui nkas you think about a progressives, they ve always viewed the constitutiosn and the laws obstacles to be avoided,ul but even more so, maybe dismantled. n to t sohe why would you even bother knowing about it? because you re not going to pay attention to them anyway. and the whole point of progressivism from day one until today is to bend ttiti to dismantle the original intent of the constitution, separationonpowers powers and ae other things that were put in place by our founders. they don t carm,e about them.go they don t want them. so why should you bother with them? because you re never going to implement them, because they re more series of suggestions that you re trying to avoid them,s y