Survivors are still mourning the loss of their Loved Ones a year after the barbaric October 7th attacks on israel. Antiisrael protesters are out in The Streets. As you can see, this is a live shot here in new York City today. Some vowing to, quote, honor the martyrs of palestine. Others chanting israel is a terrorist state. The world remembering the day that 1,200 people were slaughtered at a Music Festival and in their homes. Fears of a war in the Middle East are very, very widespread. [ screaming ] what a nightmare. 250 people were kidnapped on October The 7th. 101 hostages are still being held. They have been there now for 365 days in the tunnels of gaza. Jonathan diller survived that attack. He was at the nova Music Festival. He was supposed to be a Drone Operator that morning. He was with many of his friends. Some of whom did not make it back. Were grateful to have him joined in just a few minutes. The correspondent is outside with the protesters here in new york. Hi, brian. Hi, m
launchers, but no long or medium range missiles, especially ones with nuclear tips, capable of hitting the united states. instead, half the parade was civilians and love fest for north korea, banner, floats, ex tolling the country s economy, peace and reunification with south korea. presiding over it all was kim jong un. experts say this relatively low key parade is a sign he is still interested in pursuing nuclear negotiations with the united states and not wanting to offend the u.s. by flaunting the weapons they demanded he get rid of here s how one expert saw it. the parade sends a positive signal that kim jong un is not showing off his nuke his nukes. look, a lot of this is symbolism. a lot of this is politics.
rogue states, it s a dangerous situation. north korea, kim jong un s calculation is simply this. he believes when it comes down to war as it is acquiescent to his missile technology with nuclear tips we will acquiesce, he uses the backdrop of acquiring nuclear weapons themselves a number of years ago despite u.s. protestations. we acquiesced. the chinese, once they had acquired nuclear weapons, they wanted to acquire icbms. we protested loudly. once they acquired them, we acquiesced. that s what he s betting on here he s betting on the fact that at the end of the day, the united states will not go to war over his capability. martha: what should we do? i think the trump team, despite the fact the sanctions have always failed in the past, they are doubling down on this. there has to be a sense of urgency, because it takes sanctions well to take hold. if they go all out, it s worth trying that.
there is no deal and russians and chinese and everything else will do what they will do anyway. problems start when we lift sanctions, they get money we re not lifting bilateral sanctions to your point it is very important to me people are able to express their vote. democrats should end filibuster. they won t though. to rob s point, lifts of sanctions we talk about the money aspect of this, and money means power. lifting of sanctions on oil supplies coming out of iran. they have a long time reined in oil production. you lift on sanctions. oil supplies go back on the market. all that does is continue to fund iran and its they will have the technology for intercontinental ballistics missile. 13 years. 100 can have nuclear tips. you don t need icbmss for defense. you need them to hit cities in the united states of america. talk about iran as an enemy,
carry nuclear payloads to a theater near you. they re not intended for us. they already have missiles that reach us. they re developing icbms to reach the united states. don t give them these weapons. don t give them nuclear tips, nuclear icbms with which they can threaten you. sounds like you want congress to kill this deal. sounds like you want the u.s. congress to do everything in their power to kill this deal. is that what you would like them to do? i would like the united states and the other members of the p5 plus 1 to get a better deal. there is still time. you can ratchet up the sanctions. abiding sanctions were imposed for first time only in 2012. that got iran within 18 months to the table. once you got to the table, instead of ratcheting up the sanctions and the pressures, in fact, you reduce the pressure and iran felt no need to make any concessions at all. you have time to insist on a better deal and to ratchet up the pressure. that s the preferable route for