Are still there and we never change them theyre still dangerous and in some ways theyre more dangerous than ever because people are focused on other issues and they simply dont see the dangers that we face and sent in to parry why isnt it discussed. Thats that course is too deep for me to answer psychological question to fundamentally. When the cold war ended the danger and the worried that people had the fear that people had about a Nuclear Catastrophe just ended with it and they just dont want to pick it up again and soon again but unfortunately the reality is that the danger is still very much there. You searched at a time that the defining era of United States Nuclear Policy is that its focused on the wrong threat. What he talked about was the wrong threat so the threat that were focused on a leftover threat from the cold war is the threat of an intentional attack from russia that is simply not a likely threat because it would be suicidal for russia to watch that attack any attack
Have nuclear capabilities, it is nearing that milestone in the nuclear arms according to the pentagon. I want to get Market Reaction from abigail doolittle. We were much higher before this report. How are we thinking . Abigail we are right around where we were before those headlines. The s p 500 about. 25 . The risk on rally we have seen in august, the s p 500 in august up about 7 . Itre we are really seeing for tech stocks, the nasdaq 100 putting in another alltime high. At this point the nasdaq 100 up almost 1 ,. 9 . Not surprisingly, this has everything to do with apple, up 2. 6 . Yesterday climbing after it split, investors liking its postsplit facelift. There is a four for one split. Now the stop is around one hundred 30 as opposed to 500. The value is not different, but the optics may be more attractive to retail investors. Bloomberg put out an exclusive report about the fact the company is preparing an iphone blitz for this fall, targeting 75 Million Units to be sold. Perhaps th
This is r. T. To national for good morning and thanks for joining us. We start this hour with brother recently said Opposition Leader spitler taken off his address to fellow citizens in a new video message in which she urged them to keep up the pressure on president bush and co with more strikes almost 2 weeks after the disputed election threw the country into political turmoil. As of us thought get up so you can try some entirely legal and powerful weapon against the regime and they know it thats why they intimidate you leave the fear mongering to the dictatorship remember you are not alone im asking you to keep on striking who will make the coward hear our voices the voices he has stolen from us. The you recently expressed his full support for the below opposition voicing concerns over meddling in Domestic Affairs oscars reminded european colleagues of just what kind of impact their support last time they decided to intervene in a political crisis on russias doorstep or is it just on
True why well i think what happened is that a lot of policies that we had for the cold war for the arms race we had with the soviet union those policies never changed when the cold war ended and so as bill said people have moved on cerns have moved on to other issues but the old policies are still there and we never change them theyre still dangerous and in some ways theyre more dangerous than ever because people are focused on other issues and they simply dont see the dangers that we face and sent in to parry why isnt it discussed. Thats that course is too deep for me dance a psychological question to fundamentally when the cold war ended the danger and the worried the people had to fear the people had about a Nuclear Catastrophe just ended with it and they just dont want to pick it up again and soon again but unfortunately the reality is that the danger is still very much there. You certain tom that the defining air of United States Nuclear Policy is that its focused on the wrong thr
A Nuclear Catastrophe is actually greater now was during the cold war and were entered into a new arms race is dangerousness cost is the one in the cold war tom if thats true why well i think what happened is that a lot of policies that we had for the cold war for the arms race we had with the soviet union those policies never changed it when the cold war ended and so as bill said people have moved on their cerns have moved on to other issues but the old policies are still there and we never change them theyre still dangerous and in some ways theyre more dangerous than ever because people are focused on other issues and they simply dont see the dangers that we face and sent into perry why isnt it discussed. Thats that course is too deep for me dance a psychological question to fundamentally. When the cold war ended the danger the worried the people had the fear the people had about a Nuclear Catastrophe just ended with that and they just dont want to pick it up again or soon again but