July 25 phone call, fiona hill who was in a meeting between sondland and the ukrainians in the white house who have testified that they raised concerns about the president s conduct and people around the president s conduct regarding ukraine. Do you share any of those concerns . Do you think anything you have seen or heard so far from these fact witnesses is alarming and inappropriate . Rep. Walden the question is whether we deserve to have the president duly elected removed from office. That is the threshold of impeachment. When i went through the transcript, i was not happy. I probably would have done it differently. But no one said there is a crime, nobody who does this kind of law said there is a crime. I dont think it rises to the level of taking a president out of office, especially with an election coming up. Nor does it rise to the level of what nancy pelosi said earlier this year, which is she would not move forward on impeachment unless it was overwhelmming, compelling, and b
A jihadi group called hamas and Islamic Jihad cannot cope with the power of hezbollah, i say tens of times more than hamas, how can it handle the Islamic Republic, of course the zionist regime the crazy regime may be doing operations , but the responsibility lies with the americans and the west, and definitely with my colleagues in the organization. Also on tv and in interviews with the media, announcing the military commanders must know that the regime must choose between its own temporary survival, which it wants to continue for a few mornings, or one service, which it will do with greater speed, intensity and power. I said now that we are not responsible for their decisions , but our message is clear. I have announced to our friends in the region and to the americans, and i have already announced that hizbullah will not enter into this sadiqs meeting, they have a lot to say that if hezbollah comes, the story will be very different. Right now, in the same report that was aired , for
Messages, we knew that the americans were mainly responsible, because i said that there is no independent existence for the thirtylaw regime, the Islamic Republic is aimed at the americans, and this must have been done with your permission, and we hold you responsible. And you have to be responsible, so the answer came that i said sorry that we had no responsibility in this story we did not know. And we are looking to reduce the tension in the region, and the Islamic Republic announced in the first hour in the first message that we will definitely reciprocate and use our legitimate right to defend National Interests until the day of the operation. The first message was mainly to invite the iranians to exercise selfrestraint, and a friend of mine tweeted that the joy in forgiveness is not in revenge. There were civilized civilizations and historical civilizations and so on they wanted us, for example, in an ethical interpretation , sir, how is the Islamic Republic this time compared to
France will come immediately. And i dont know if he took issue with breaking his silence and did not make it to the statement. Well , how much effort did the ministry of Foreign Affairs put in before the second meeting of the security council, which was convened at the request of the zionist regime . You saw that the result of the second meeting, which was requested by the zionist regime, was a few speeches that were meant to empty the minds of the americans, which we are used to. There is nothing special and it was nothing but the diplomatic jihad that we in the ministry of Foreign Affairs and our esteemed ambassadors in all countries did to enlighten the political authorities of the countries, and in my opinion , our diplomatic apparatus showed up well in response to the events in the field, and we should thank both of them. These friends, commanders, and diplomats of ours must be destroyed, and apparently even after the operation , this was the message of the rearguards that now, fi
Panelists in the most difficult position of any panel in any event which is standing between resistance and the bar. But there is extraordinary substance on this panel, and the intent is to turn us forwardlooking. I would like to turn over to ambassador john ordway, our partner in kazakhstan. John, it is an honor and a pleasure to have you here as our moderator. Amb. Ordway thank you very much. We are facing the future with an urgent set of problems and to prove they are urgent we are going to have a little time to deal with them. Let me just say i really liked from the beginning what bill perry said about the challenge of this separation of the variables and what we are going to do with this panel is separate those variables and address them separately. I would like to recall what the general said that he is optimistic, and the time to renew the work we have been talking about is not somewhere over the hills. There is it is not over the hills, but i expect there is still a lot of terr