Nato and europe and other places and the world is that we do not have the financial means for the aspirations that we have for our national security. Its just not matched up. We cant afford as the United States the Standing Army that we currently have to keep them standing forever, number one. Number two, the recap talization of the Nuclear Force that we have today in a form that is exactly like it is today is unaffordable. So weve got to come to some understanding collectively about what aspirations actually are and what of those aspirations are realizable and thats been a difficult discussion. Theres another piece from a conventional standpoint, we in the United States have been a global power, forward based and forward operating, more and more countries, mostly all countries, do not want large american armies on their soil. Thats reality. The cost to have forces every place in the world on mobile platforms is unaffordable. We have a disconnect in as pieration and reality of the reso
Time To Update NATO s Nuclear Posture | The Heritage Foundation
heritage.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heritage.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
NATO s Nuclear Posture Needs Updating | The Heritage Foundation
heritage.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heritage.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.