gulf between the west and some of these middle eastern and muslim countries. that s the problem you hit when these two cultures clash when folks immigrate and they don t assimilate to western values. i will say to juan s point, we are not just seeing a snapshot in some of these polls of what muslims believe but of what muslims in very religion is russ closed authoritarian societies believe. so the more liberal the country, the more likely western ally somebody like turkey, the better numbers you see. there is an i couldn t know lying problem here. bill: seq. collarrism always erodes that kind of thinking. i m not interested in going country by country. i m interested in the overarch of a problem that i don t know if it s possible to solve. in pakistan, which the united states desperately needs, desperately needs, to defeat the taliban, in pakistan, 85% of the population, juan, supports a law that separate men and women in the workplace. which means men and women could not work togeth
discouraging them. the president said that argument may make for a good sound bite but it s not true major garrett is sorting it all out from the white house tonight. this is a shootout in the senate it would appear. that s right. two parts to the story. showdown part first. current legislative strategy of senate democrats. they have called for a vote on monday to test whether or not republicans, all 41 of them will line up and defend their current filibuster against proceeding to a bill on regulatory reform of the financial seq. for. if democrats can t get the 60 votes they need. they have to refrench and come up with a new plan. senator leader harry reid explaining why now is the time for confrontation. my friends on the other side of the aisle are betting on failure again as they have done with health care and everything this year. health care was not obama s waterloo. maybe they want this to be his waterloo but it s not going to be. democrats belief they are going to prevail
he appeared on tv moments after results came out saying he would attempt a legal challenge. but the u.s. state department and the united nations said they were satisfied with the vote counting process. it is the u.n. s considered opinion that these elections have been credible and we congratulate the people of iraq with their success. iraq s election commission is also standing by the results. any doubt about our hard work will not serve the country and the public interest and will complicate the situation. a alawi is a shiite. he had support from shiewns who boycotted the last election in 2005. partial vote counts have shown him ahead in the balloting, but it still came as a surprise that he managed to upset maliki and win the right to take a first try at forming a new government. maliki leads a moderate shiite block that had tried to distance itself from seq. terrorism. he still has a shot at keeping his job if he can build a large
if he does, this will be a very difficult day for us. and a huge setback for any chance of democracy in iraq. bret: juan. there has been no sign of fraud that the u.s. has detected to the u.s. is saying wait a second, you have to abide by the results. maliki on the other hand says he wants to chalt results. there is no basis for challenging the results. so then we come back to what charles is discussing, by the way, i thought that card looked like a wild card joker more than anything else. but, anyway. we come back to what charles is discussing which is is he going to use violent means to try to maintain power. the heartening thing and concerning things. heartening thing that he ran as a seq. could you last. he is a shiite. so here you have some four years after what we thought was a civil war, an ethnic a shiite running, appealing to sunnies as a secularist. that s encouraging, the fact that he could win. the discouraging thing or the
if he does, this will be a very difficult day for us. and a huge setback for any chance of democracy in iraq. bret: juan. there has been no sign of fraud that the u.s. has detected to the u.s. is saying wait a second, you have to abide by the results. maliki on the other hand says he wants to chalt results. there is no basis for challenging the results. so then we come back to what charles is discussing, by the way, i thought that card looked like a wild card joker more than anything else. but, anyway. we come back to what charles is discussing which is is he going to use violent means to try to maintain power. the heartening thing and concerning things. heartening thing that he ran as a seq. could you last. he is a shiite. so here you have some four years after what we thought was a civil war, an ethnic a shiite running, appealing to sunnies as a secularist. that s encouraging, the fact that he could win.