the western wall being defined as occupied territory. so resolution 2234 is a radical step i listened to secretary kerry today, trying diminish it. the difference between what he was pointing to is that hamas now controls gaza. that the fatah has gone radical and president abbas is president for life. i m agreeing with chuck schur and other democrats like steny hoyer. they ve gone off the edge and i don t think it can be reversed to blow them off the first week. you can t change this. they ve done some real damage. and i think part of it was a did i have frergs the catastrophe of syria, from the red line that was not enforced, from the j.v.s still in mosul. a diverse from leading from behind. i think that s what it was all about. thank you all for joining us. and coming up, much more on
middle east that ultimately there will be two states. israel and a palestine. that stal stein will be most of the west bank, gaza. this is where it is ultimately headed. a generation later, after this was codified, not the reality right now. is this still a plausible end game here? i guess so. you could say there is a flicker of hope. it is on the ground. what you re seeing on the ground will make it extremely difficult. you hear that it with drew settlements from sinai when it made peace with egypt. none of those were on the scale. that we re talking about in terms of the size of the settlement and the very nature of the settlers on there. there has been concern that trying to remove 600,000
the palestinian territory pretty much along the 67 borders, gaza strip, those are occupied territories. the united states, for most people who have studied this, does not intend to move its embassy into east jerusalem. it would make itself, entangle it seventh in legal problems. it would move to the west part of the city which will be part of israel in some capacity. so it is a safe move if they decide to do it. it is just a highly provocative move. something that the arab world, the muslim world, have so far rejected. and again, you had john kerry come out. today gave this speech. talked to the press for over an hour. then you have the israeli prime minister minutes later really coming out and responding in very, very strong terms. what was the rationale from the
the international law that says, the palestinian territory pretty much along the 67 borders, gaza strip, those are occupied territories. the united states, for most people who have studied this, does not intend to move its embassy into east jerusalem. it would make itself, entangle it seventh in legal problems. it would move to the west part of the city which will be part of israel in some capacity. so it is a safe move if they decide to do it. it is just a highly provocative move. something that the arab world, the muslim world, have so far rejected. and again, you had john kerry come out. today gave this speech. talked to the press for over an hour. then you have the israeli prime minister minutes later really coming out and responding in very, very strong terms.
middle east that ultimately there will be two states. israel and a palestine. that stal stein will be most of the west bank, gaza. this is where it is ultimately headed. a generation later, after this was codified, not the reality right now. is this still a plausible end game here? i guess so. you cld say there is a flicker of hope. it is on the ground. what you re seeing on the ground will make it extremely difficult. you hear that it with drew settlements from sinai when it made peace with egypt. none of those were on the scale. that we re talking about in terms of the size of the settlement and the very nature of the settlers on there. there habeen concernhat trying to remove 600,000