there s not footprints of amanda knox. there s nothing. no one questioned rudy guede s guilt. yet, two and a half weeks after amanda s trial ended, guede s sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16, leading some to ask, did he cut a deal? there s overwhelming dna evidence along with lots of other physical evidence that points to rudy guede. amanda s attorneys appealed the verdict and focused on challenging the dna evidence. when the appeals process began, it felt like they had another mountain to climb that right away you could tell that there was a very different tone, and, again, the key decision was whether or not they would allow an independent assessment of the forensic evidence. november 24th, 2010. 11 months after the guilty verdict, a second trial is granted. the defense presented a very compelling occasion identifying rudy guede as the true killer,
yet, two and a half weeks after amanda s trial ended, guede s sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16, leading some to ask, did he cut a deal? there s overwhelming dna evidence along with lots of other physical evidence that points to rudy guede. amanda s attorneys appealed the verdict and focused on challenging the dna evidence. when the appeals process began, it felt like they had another mountain to climb that right away you could tell that there was a very different tone, and, again, the key decision was whether or not they would allow an independent assessment of the forensic evidence. november 24th, 2010. 11 months after the guilty verdict, a second trial is granted. the defense presented a very compelling occasion identifying rudy guede as the true killer, based on hard facts and motive. rudy guede came to the house. he broke in. he was in the bathroom.
amanda s trial ended, guede s sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16, leading some to ask did he cut a deal? there s overwhelming dna evidence along with lots of other physical evidence that points to rudy guede. amanda s attorneys appealed the verdict and focused on challenging the dna evidence. when the appeals process began, it felt like they had another mountain to climb that right away you could tell that there was a very different tone, and, again, the key decision was whether or not they would allow an independent assessment of the forensic evidence. november 24th, 2010. 11 months after the guilty verdict a second trial is granted. the defense presented a very compelling case identifying rudy guede as the true killer, based on hard facts and motive. rudy guede came to the house. he broke in. he was in the bathroom.
sentence was reduced from 30 years to 16, leading some to ask did he cut a deal? there s overwhelming dna evidence along with lots of other physical evidence that points to rudy guede. amanda s attorneys appealed the verdict and focused on challenging the dna evidence. when the appeals process began, it felt like they had another mountain to climb that right away you could tell that there was a very different tone, and, again, the key decision was whether or not they would allow an independent assessment of the forensic evidence. november 24th, 2010. 11 months after the guilty verdict a second trial is granted. the defense presented a very compelling case identifying rudy guede as the true killer, based on hard facts and motive. rudy guede came to the house. he broke in. he was in the bathroom. he left his own dna in the bam