basically released on saturday and basically echos the democratic witness opinion from last week that trump has set himself up as a king. brian: the president decided he is not going to have a presence there buzz words you will hear today evidence is uncontested and indisputable. we know that is not true because we have a television that has volume. we also have newspapers and online reports. if you know anything, there is a dispute going on nonstop. even if you are the most partisan democrat you must understand that there is a republican point of view to this and that the president did nothing impeachable. if you don t think the phone call is perfect, you have to understand, also, this guy named jonathan turleyly gave you the other side. when you say uncontested and indisputable. that is flat out wrong. he will do it again is the other thing. if we don t stop the president, he will do it again. he will do what again? he will go infiltrate, use another country to infiltrate its electio
intelligence committee have unearthed enough evidence in my opinion to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. but after two weeks and 17 witnesses, adam schiff and his gang of political malcontents failed miserably. if you re the president, you d obviously much rather hear from pirro. it seems to me napolatono is providing reasoned arguments. trump has plenty of defenders on the air like gregg jarod who wrote a column saying trump did nothing impeachable. the president shared it on twitter. i would think this thanksgiving trump lightly gave thanks to those people in the world. hear what trump told bill o reilly the other day. the call was a perfect call. i had your friend mark levin go do a whole thing.
and the commentators right ring but not pro trump every time, they are drowned out by the sycophant s. maybe it s a tale of two judges. two fox news judges. jeanine pirro who was a judge versus andrew napollitono. fox viewers like pirro. she was at the white house two days in a row this week. she was spotted at the ceremony for a dog and then getting her picture taken. napolitano is a target of trump s ire. he says trump s conduct with the ukrainian president is impeachable. he says trump has admitted to criminal behavior and says there s plenty of evidence. compare and contrast the two judges for me. the democrats on the house
day, that s a political drama and a boring one at that. ed: jason, what needs to happen, to gianno s point, differently this in week two? every one of those, quote-unquote, star witnesses when pressed said they saw nothing illegal or impeachable. i don t know that they said they didn t actually make any judgments in terms of ed: well, hang on, i m going to let you speak. but that s not their job. ed: pardon me, john ratcliffe asked bill taylor as i recall last wednesday, anything impeachable? he didn t answer initially, then he gave a longer thing that never said he believed there was anything impeachable. and quickly, the body on friday the ambassador on friday, she was asked did you see anything illegal? no. she says that under oath. so i just want to correct the record when you say, no, that never happened. they were asked those direct questions. now, maybe more evidence will come out, and i am going to give you a chance to speak now, jason, but so far they said, as gian
investors gordon sondland and kurt volker. a big loss for president trump in court today when the second court of appeals ruled the president s accounting firm has to turn over eight years of the president s tax returns to the manhattan district attorney. the president s outside attorneys immediately said they would appeal this case all the way to the supreme court. bret? bret: john roberts live on the north lot. john, thank you. the constitution sets the standard for impeachment and it revolves around a fairly vague set of four words. high crimes and misdemeanors. capitol hill senior producer chad program digs into what qualifies as an impeachable offense. it was perfect. it was perfect. not a thing wrong with it. i hadn t heard illegal, nothing impeachable. i do not think an aggressive phone call to a world leader rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.