can t tell whether amazes overwhelming until the trial actually happens. let s go through the evidence that they have. it seems like recordings that they have, notes that they have. from the recording aspect, it s misleading. it s suggesting that it s a recording of donald trump. it s not a recording of donald trump as i understand. and it s a recording of the lawyer who made mental impressions and notes as a result of his conversations. it s twofold, there was audio recording and then there s a recording of the note taking of evan corcoran as well. per donald trump s actions within their conversation. and at what point evan corcoran knows that donald trump makes this plucking impression with his hand to say, if you re gonna put them in the same maybe pluck went out. well, not the same thing as having donald trump recorded. i understand those other things that donald trump s made statements. i m sure the government will try and introduce those against him a trial as admission
watched his careful note taking, his whispered asides whose attorney. he felt that he was wrongfully prosecuted. the only way we can type lot of things and actually prove things, disprove thinks, let s buy him testifying. how would he convey his innocence? first, by describing his hospital vigil, a concern sign on the night of the shooting. did he acknowledge? he could squeeze your hand but you can speak. how did you feel when you saw your father at the trauma center? shocked, hurt, worried, scared. not that chris first claimed to be a perfect son. in fact, he told the jury he was a drug dealer. garrett koch was one of his best customers but had good reason to turn on him. why? because years earlier, christopher said, he turned police informant to give drug