he emerged today, of course, refusing to take any questionse to defend his department s actions. visa v former president.ia my role is completelysp consistenteak on with regulatios that set forth the responsibilities of , e attorney general underco the special counsel regulations, and i followed thos te regulations. lau look, let sra be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or? are you part of a political operation to get a conviction 81% mp by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believeof reb about all you know. this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructivvee presidentsha the united states has ever had. joe biden. and they rjoe bide e now consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be a a.g. if he didn t hadn t greenlitlig a special prosecutor. this case, everyone at msnbc and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they
and cnn believes that garland tu is trying to put trump in jailt. no matter where the facts lead. otherwise they would be calling tonight for his removal. it s really not thaty not complicatethd. and any of the lawyers on tv and the presidential candidates or former officials with really big titles who claim trump is, quote, toast or act like this is a slam case,m-dunk they re embarrassing themselves . they know or should know that every piece of information abou shoy piece t this case hasn presented by the federal government to a trump hating media. and it has been framed i trump han worst possible light from the entire narrative, hasm. been skewed sma by jack smith and merrick garland at doj. and it s been presented to a public that is generally public tunfamiliar with how thel process works or even what an indictment actually is. g fo but going forward, we re going to learn a lot more. this prosecution, the tactics and the methods ofe jack smithw