The latest happening in china. Meanwhile President Trump is in india this morning, speaking at a rally with indian Prime Minister narendra modi, hes headed to taj mahal as we speak. Bernie sanders with clear victory in nevada but having trouble on how to pay for big plans, battle for the white house moving onto South Carolina. Verdict in Harvey Weinstein case, mornings with maria is live right now. Maria top story this morning market selloff, take a look at futures, down 818 points as fears about coronavirus rise across the world. The number of cases is jumping across the world. I want you to look at this map, bahrain 31st country, 79,000 cases across the world. The death toll is spiking at 2600. I spoke with white house trade adviser Peter Navarro on sunday morning futures of impact of coronavirus. I want to ask you about what the u. S. Is relying on from china because i know that they more plenty of ships that were supposed to be carrying medical equipment, medical supplies, componen
Keynote. Justice inclusion and imagining and building alternative platfor platforms. To introduce our guests, im going to turn it over. Well kick start that panel with that. Thank you. All right. For our panel today we have four wonderful speakers. Im going to start by introdu introducing them. We have margine. He earned tenure there and he will shortly have the exciting new title of associate professor. [ applause ] all right. Sarah jay jackson is an associate professor of communication at North Eastern university and in july shell be starting a new position as the president ial associate professor of communication at the university of pennsylvanias school for communication. [ applause ] math thu matthew is at the school for communication. [ applause ] im an associate professor of Communication Arts at the university of wisconsin madison. In this panel we want to explore the question of how we can use new Media Technologies for the specific purposes of Racial Justice and inclusion. It
The s. U. D. Allows special height exceptions for the 80. 18t districts in these areas the height can go up to 120 or 130 feet if the exception is granted. And the increase height serves as a transition from the higher downtown heights to the generally lower heights of the surrounding residential buildings. Conditions of approval are imposed on these to mitigate the impacts to the increased height which is likely to have impact on Affordable Housing in the area. The code lists an impact fee of 5 per square foot above 80 feet. The ordinance will move the exiting north of market fee into the city wide Affordable Housing fund making that consistent with other Affordable Housing fees such as the jobs Housing Linkage Program and inclusionary Affordable Housing program. The ordinance also seeks to list the eastern neighborhoods area plan alternate Affordable Housing feet. This is already established in the planning code and must be deposited into the city wide fund. The original north of mar
Is this the Planning Department that we the citizens of San Francisco are paying for . Were playing for a Planning Department that is not examining the cost of transportation and the dangers of transportation increasing the gridlock. You are responsible for this. Frankly, again, as i raised earlier, the mayor and the developers are running San Francisco and they dont give a damn as long as they can make profit by building more construction. This is insane. Its outrageous. The fact you have nothing to say about it, you dont get to the specifics tells me you really dont care either about what is going on in San Francisco. The gridlock is a responsibility of the Planning Department. You are improving more and more construction, Mass Construction without agreeing there should be transportation, proper transportation. Thats political incompetence and malfeasance in my view. Where is the Planning Commission . Where is the director of planning in San Francisco about the gridlock . What is you
Damn as long as they can make profit by building more construction. This is insane. Its outrageous. The fact you have nothing to say about it, you dont get to the specifics tells me you really dont care either about what is going on in San Francisco. The gridlock is a responsibility of the Planning Department. You are improving more and more construction, Mass Construction without agreeing there should be transportation, proper transportation. Thats political incompetence and malfeasance in my view. Where is the Planning Commission . Where is the director of planning in San Francisco about the gridlock . What is your solution in 2050 . Can we get by next year with all this new construction . All this new construction in San Francisco is going to add massively to a transportation gridlock but its not on your radar. Again, where is the Planning Commissioner is the executive director of planning . Whats their plan for all the new construction. Is it a massive transit, a Public Transit bei