Welcome everybody. Justices, it is so great to have you here to help celebrate civic learning week. To those of you who are tuning in our here for the first part of the day, this is in operating a full week of activity all around the United States to emphasize the centrality ofleard the ability to govern ourselves in this democratic republic. We are so delighted to be joined here by justices sotomayor and barrett. They need no introduction, but i feel compelled to provide one nonetheless and to kind of add respect for their offices and for their achievements to share what we have here. Nia sotomayor , associate justice, was born in the bronx on june 25th, 1954. She earned a ba from princeton university, graduating summa, loudly, and receiving the highest academic honor presented to an undergraduate. In 1979 she earned a jd from yale law school. She served as editor of the yale law journal. She later served as an assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorneys offi
Discusses how multilevel marketinprofits. She is interviewed by a Business Insider correspondent. Watch book tv every sunday on cspan2, and find a full hedule on the program guide, or watch online anytime at booktv. Org. Announcer now, Supreme Court justices Sonia Sotomayor and amy coney barrett. They talk about the importance discussion hosted by the group icivics, which the late Justice Sandra day oconnor founded in 2009. This is just over one hour. Welcome everybody. Justices, it is so great to have you here to help celebrate civic learning week. To those of you who are tuning in our the first part of the day, this is in operating a full week of activity all around the United States to emphasize the centrality of civic learning at this time and the ability to govern ourselves in this democratic republic. We are so delighted to be joined here by justices sotomayor and barrett. They need no introduction, but i feel compelled to provide one nonetheless and to kind of add respect for th
Room, i will see you soon for two full weeks in the courtroom, the Hush Money Case the payoff to adult film star Stormy Daniels with testimony from Michael Cohens banker. Also on the stand, trumps longtime assistant, rhona graff, known for her appearances on The Apprentice. Why hur testimony left her former boss smiling all of this after tabloid executive david pecker wrapped up his pivotal testimony for the next hour for will take you inside the courtroom from gavel to gavel. Are reporters and experts are all standing by to break down all of todays most important developments and to look ahead to whats next welcome to our viewers here in the United States and around the world. I will blitzer with a Special Report in this room that trump trial today and lets get right to the Breaking News, the trump trial gets closer to the heart of the criminal charges against the former president , Michael Cohens bank are starting to testify on the arrangements for the Hush Money Payments to Stormy D
Constitution society we ensure the law is enforced. If you arent already, i would encourage you to become a member of acs and you can join and find more information on our website. Before we get started, a few housekeeping notes. Additional information on cle material can be found on the invents page just on the events page. There will be time at the end of today for audience questions. Two semitic question use the q and a box at the bottom of the zoom screen but do not use the chat to ask your russian as we will not be monitoring it. If you are a member of the press asking a question, please identify the outlet for which you are reporting of the top of your question. Now lets turn to todays discussion. Each year, the Supreme Court term draws to a close and the summer begins. We host a discussion with academics, practitioners and advocates about some of the most controversial consequential topics in the turn. This year is no different step in a minute, you will hear from this years dis
That is the sternest you can imagine about confidentiality. It is an incredibly strong norm in the court because it is fraught enough without having to worry about these things. I would say two things. I clerked before the pandemic when most people work from their offices. We had laptops, but were not necessarily working from home. There is a greater possibility that the leak was maybe not intentional, or at least not the result of someone setting out to do this. More of a leak of opportunity. That leads to the second thing, i do worry that the leak overshadows the importance of the decision that was leaked. Your second point was mine. The fact of the leak is so much less consequential than the content of the leak. To the extent that anyone is questioning the Supreme Court is not the fact that an opinion got out, but the fact that it is willing to remake the law in its own conservative image. I might take a different take on it. The norms and the processes are trend substantive. If you