august 21st, an intelligence firm noticed the unusual presence of russian strategic bombers on site, spring break supersonic bombers designed to carry nuclear weapons. you re seeing the satellite imageries on your screen right now. then just days ago, on septembei intelligence spotted three more russian strategic bombers, t tu-95s. prior to august, there were no strategic bombers. now, as of this week, there are at least seven. ukraine is well within the range of both bombers. in related news, the deputy of the head of intelligence, determines there s a high risk of imminent risk of tactical strikes on ukraine. how could you going to lower the temperature, prevent global nuclear war? that s the only question that matters. our leaders, though, have no answer instead of calming tensions, they seem to be deliberately provoking russia. today joe biden once again accused vladimir putin of blowing up his own pipeline. asked me earlier about the pipeline. let me say this. it was a
In keeping with our Commitment to America, U.S. House Republicans recently passed H.R 1, the Lower Energy Costs Act, which garnered bipartisan support. Designating the Lower Energy Costs Act as H.R. 1 signals that House Republicans’ number one priority is reducing the cost of gasoline and energy for American families.
global oil and gas prices and in turn make money on existing contracts with india and china. but here s a question why blow up your own infrastructure? why not, you know, just turn off the tap? in fact, that s exactly what vladimir putin did just a few weeks ago. he shut down the nord stream ii pipeline. there was no gas flowing through of the pipeline he s accused of destroying to restrict the flow of gas, none of which was flowing through. i don t know who s responsible for this. i m logically following incentive. if the u.s. and its allies sabotaged russian pipelines it wouldn t be the first time. in 1982, ronald reagan, authorized the cia to blow up a siberian national gas pipeline using software. so we, american citizens, before we march to a drumbeat directly
times from secretary blinken including in europe this week is this idea of, you know shoulder-to-shoulder unity with our nato and european allies in deterring russia and threatening these swift and, you know, massive sanctions that secretary blinken keeps warning of. i think the reality when you look more closely at it is that there is not unity on how to respond. france and germany in particular have a lot to lose from an economic fight with russia. they are heavily dependent on russia economically. the germans get a vast amount of their energy supplies from russia. that s one reason we are seeing this nord stream ii pipeline, and one factor there is that germany is moving away from nuclear power and so more dependent on things like natural gas. so the germans and french, nobody wants a war with russia, but the germans and french stand to lose a lot from an economic war with russia. the united states has very few economic ties to russia, and we wouldn t have actually lose all that muc
the project, costing more than £8 billion finished last september, but still awaiting approval from european regulators. the us has threatened to halt opening a key energy pipeline, if russia decides to invade ukraine. the nord stream ii pipeline between russia and germany is set to supply natural gas to western europe. the project costing more than eight billion pounds finished last september, but is still awaiting approval from european regulators. let s speak to drjack sharples, research fellow at the oxford institute for energy studies. ina way, in a way, this is an extraordinary intervention by the us, but this pipeline has really been at the centre of clinical difficulty between europe, germany in particular and russia. absolutely, - re particular and russia. absolutely, pretty much particular and russia. absolutely, pretty much since particular and russia. absolutely, pretty much since its particular and russia. absolutely, pretty much since its inception, i particular an