Talk about the e. U. The e. U. Is not a very democratic institution. When you look at the majority of people in poland, in other parts of europe, they support these policies that the e. U. Elites themselves really deplore. Theres talk earlier this year of the e. U. Sanctioning the Czech Republic and poland and hungary for their immigration policy. Huge majorities in those countries favor restricting migrants. They dont want the country to be flooded with migrants the way germany has been. The e. U. Wants to punish them for that. When we talk about e. U. Or european elites, we arent really talk about people who care all that much what actual citizens of poland want. Or think. Tucker you see that here in this country on display every day. How long can fake democracy continue . Ethically seeing the repercussions, the backlash from
everything about his little puppet donald trump. Our president is walking into a room tomorrow morning in hamburg germany with a guy looking across to them like
that, my frustration in this debate is that a lot of the players in it are not straightforward about what they are really for them what they are really against. their agendas are closed. why is assad the focus of so much anger in washington? i don t know. i try only to talk about things i ve studied. what i do know is that when the syrian civil war began five, six years ago, there were a lot of dirty hands in that mix. including american hands. everybody was arming somebody. we have a monstrous war going on there with so many groups being armed by so many different states, but the thing about assad to me has always been, and maybe this is colloquial, but he has been the protector of the and christians, and the nonjihadists islamic population in syria. at a time when the main threat there, the islamic state, isis, caps off the heads of these
straightforwardio about what thy are really for them what they are i really against. their agendas are closed. why is assad the focus of so much anger in washington? i don t know. i try only to talk about things i ve studied. what i do know is that when the syrian civil war began five, six years ago, there were a lot of dirty hands in that mix. including american hands. everybody was arming somebody. we have a monstrous warr going n there with so many groups being armed by so many different states, but the thing about assad to me has always been, and maybe this is colloquial, but he has been the protector of the and christians, and the nonjihadists islamic population in syria. at a time when the main threat there, the islamic state, isis, caps off the heads of these people. it would seem to me that we shouldes stick with assad untile
that, my frustration in this debate is that a lot of the players in it are not straightforward about what they are really for them what they are really against. their agendas are closed. why is assad the focus of so much anger in washington? i don t know. i try only to talk about things i ve studied. what i do know is that when the syrian civil war began five, six years ago, there were a lot of dirty hands in that mix. including american hands. everybody was arming somebody. we have a monstrous war going on there with so many groups being armed by so many different states, but the thing about assad to me has always been, and maybe this is colloquial, but he has been the protector of the and christians, and the nonjihadists islamic population in syria. at a time when the main threat there, the islamic state, isis, caps off the heads of these