significant issues with sources, methods and other national security information. maybe we can read through this live on t.v. or fun, right? press absolutely! i m sure there are a lot of people chomping at the bit. by all means, if you see something that catches your eye. okay i will do that. the key thing to look for here, based on what i understand is the democrats make the argument there was additional intelligence available to fbi and just department in 2015 agape probable cause to request a surveillance warrant or the trump campaign foreign policy advisor, quarter page. and the dossier is really not that central to the application. what i would tell people is that quarter page was a nonentity to the fbi at the time. he had become a cooperating witness with the fbi in 2013 and a counterintelligence, that is an espionage case involving
should be? if there s a mechanism for protection and she wants to use it, she should. i think ultimately she will be allowed to do so. shannon: i started going flashbacks to law school, but these are important legal arguments. there are number of states that will allow you to remain anonymous. others that will allow you to do this through a trust, but the vast majority of states want people to know who the winners are. they want you to stay in stand there with the big fake check because the publicity help them sell more tickets. any chance they are able to convince this judge otherwise? doubtful, because frankly it s all about transparency. anybody that has ever litigated with the government, it s all about transparency. they have to go forward, this is what happens when you purchase these lottery tickets. it s clear in the walls. great that you may have an argument, but frankly it doesn t stop the fact that the instructions are so clear. you go on the website, it s clearly defined
should be? if there s a mechanism for protection and she wants to use it, she should. i think ultimately she will be allowed to do so. shannon: i started going flashbacks to law school, but these are important legal arguments. there are number of states that will allow you to remain anonymous. others that will allow you to do this through a trust, but the vast majority of states want people to know who the winners are. they want you to stay in stand there with the big fake check because the publicity help them sell more tickets. any chance they are able to convince this judge otherwise? doubtful, because frankly it s all about transparency. anybody that has ever litigated with the government, it s all about transparency. they have to go forward, this is what happens when you purchase these lottery tickets. it s clear in the walls. great that you may have an argument, but frankly it doesn t stop the fact that the instructions are so clear. you go on the website, it s clearly defined
sides. so, bannon left this hanging out there for five days. didn t backtrack from what he was saying, no apology. he comes around pretty late. i don t think it s being received warmly in the west wing. i will say that, you know, if bannon had never apologized, his prospects as a political influencer were pretty slim, right? i mean, he s tied to trump now in a way that, without trump, he s kind of a nonentity. and rick tyler, in the midterm elections, without rebecca mercer, without the mercer money funding some kind of challenges against incumbents, the big winner is mitch mcconnell and incumbents with bannon on the outs. i agree. i disagree a little with dave, yes, being attached to trump gives you the in, but if he had breitbart and the money, because we can put a lot of money into different elections and have a huge influence. but without that money, how will you have any influence?
a new normal, that our poverty and our inequality cannot be hidden behind beautiful beaches and scenery and we need to look at our reality and set the foundation to transform puerto rico. it s not only the elimination of a debt, but what kind of economic development model we re going to put forward in order to have a more democratic and a society where people are really taking charge. one of the things i like about senator sanders plan which includes the u.s. vi is it puts the transformation of puerto rico in puerto rican hands. we have the fiscal control board that is now asking all the moneys that come through are pushed through them. that s putting another nonentity which is not democratically appointed. and the people of puerto rico and the people of the u.s. vi we