who got advanced word during that dinner of a previous supreme court decision. even though samuel aledo and his wife have been publicly identified, as potential leaks, with a previous supreme court opinion, they were not questioned in this investigation. chief justice assigned the investigation to the new marshal of the supreme court and her staff, none of whom have ever had to conduct an investigation at the supreme court before. the marshal of the supreme court has the following duties. overseeing the operations of the supreme court building, including space management, maintenance, and cleaning, renovation, property, and supplies, procurement and contracting, telecommunications, parking, managing the motor pool, and coordinating most events at the court. and it manages the courtroom, including seeding, security, reporting proceedings, and
keeping time of oral accounts. investigating leaks at the supreme is not one of the jobs of the marshall. john roberts decided he should do this investigation. john roberts and his personal decision at the outset to assign this investigation to people who had no confidence or experience to do so. the marshals report says that the investigators, quote, conducted 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, all of whom denied the disclosing opinion, despite the efforts of investigators unable to determine at the time using a preponderance of the evidence standard. you identify of the person who disclosed the draft majority opinion in dobbs versus jackson, women s health organization, or how the draft was provided to politico. 97 employees.
virtually identical word for word to the leaked opinion and not a single vote changed. the chief justice of the united states ordered an investigation to find out who leaked the opinion and why, is investigation did not find out who leaked the opinion, but the chief justices decided all by himself, without any evidence at all why the opinion was leaked. the chief justice of the united states calls it a misguided attempt at protest and the chief justice does not even sign his name to that statement that he wrote today. he simply calls it a statement of the court, but it is impossible that that statement could have been written by anyone other than the chief justice, which is patently obvious and the very first line of the statement. in may, 2022, this court suffered one of the worst
states ordered an investigation to find out who leaked the opinion and why, is investigation did not find out who leaked the opinion, but the chief justices decided all by himself, without any evidence at all why the opinion was leaked. the chief justice of the united states calls it a misguided attempt at protest and the chief justice does not even sign his name to that statement that he wrote today. he simply calls it a statement of the court, but it is impossible that that statement could have been written by anyone other than the chief justice, which is patently obvious and the very first line of the statement. in may, 2022, this court suffered one of the worst breaches of trust in its history. would any chief justice
ask after the chief justice issued a publicly on the supreme court s investigation of the leak. the draft opinion that overturned roe v. wade last year. in his cover statement about the court, the chief justice said the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by the preponderance of the investigation. nobody questioned ginni thomas? nobody questioned any of those spouses of any of the supreme court justices. nobody questioned the justices themselves, and this investigation of the supreme court. samuel alito, the author of the opinion and his wife were criminally accused last year of having a private dinner in