we care more when it s in ourself interest to care. right and to use a phrase that i think craig night have run across once or twice, we are a city on a shining hill. fen e when you think of that image, these are people out there, looking up, aspiring, not necessarily that we are going in, saving them. craig, before we leave, we bought the to, mark a moment in the development of the republican party. you and i have been on one side, not in this durnt conflict. on one side of the republican party, there have been more non-interventionists. the republican party moved far away. yes. from where we were in the 1980s, under reagan, where we were in the 1950s under ike, where we were in the 1990s, even. right. it s safe to say the neocons are on the run. this last crisis have shown they are at lowest until another republican president is sworn in, they re in the overwhelming minority republican party.
saturday of last week. and now what they re talking about is the difference between a red line 13 months ago and a red line that was defined yesterday. how do you do that? yeah. i think that s one of many things that are causing so many of the folks in the republicans in the house these troubles. look, if you look at the way the landscape is in the house republican conference, you got people who i say, rand paul, non-interventionists, and hawks likely to vote in favor of this. but you ve got the vast majority of people, republicans in the house who are open to doing something, who certainly identify witthe need to help alleviate the slaughter, 100,000 dead in syria these days but are very worried about following this president because of the way he specifically, because of the way he is conducted himself on these issues in the course of his presidency, and, the fact that he can t and his senior national security advisors can t provide a real understanding of