hospital clearly worked, reduced mortality and should be used as standard of care. the other issue that is still vexing to me personally is a non-doctor, you ve addressed this so well over the last year which is acquired or adaptive immunity or natural immunity but if you get exposed to covid you produce t cells and antibody response. the idea that somehow you are worse off than someone who gets the vaccine, that is what they keep pushing to this day despite the cleveland clinic study that came out. right. it is irrational and it is all designed to sell vaccines which you can predict what people will say when anything comes out because it is always in one direction and the cleveland study showed 1500 people who had covid who had no risk of subsequent diagnosis or infection, and previous infection works very well to
Jugo Naranja: Morena va contra el INE
vanguardia.com.mx - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vanguardia.com.mx Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
jamie: in testimony on friday prosecutors brought in a model of that bathtub. that is what you re looking at here to show how michelle s body was found by paramedics, partially clothed, face down in the water. criminal defense attorney, doug burns. welcome. thank you. jamie: i think this case is interesting for this reason, that he s a doctor. yes. jamie: and he knows about the medications. he knows about proper and lethal dosage. yep. jamie: and the question i have, doug, for you first, must this judge give a jury instruction to this jury and say, yes, he has knowledge, ability, perhaps motive, but consider him a non-doctor, like any person because it is prejudicial that he had that knowledge? that is an extremely interesting question. i m not really sure. normally there is generic instructions that say look, everybody stands equally. put aside they have specialized knowledge. if you ask for that instruction you may get it.
murray s defense team will call its own propofol expert, dr. paul white, to the stand, and the pressure is growing on chernoff and flanagan to persuasively counter the prosecution s strong case. they have no examples of that. when he presented dr. murray as a non-doctor and i think the jury believes that. we have to bring them back to the issue of causation. we have to get it to be a cardiac arrest that starts this thing, otherwise you lose mathematically. you honestly think that in the cross-examination of schaffer, he is going to admit that it is a cardiac arrest, and we will have that argument? that conversation? no, he has to admit that he doesn t know, because he has never studied the effects of propofol. and when i ask him, i will say, isn t it true na you don t know, and he will say, i do know, because of this and this and this and we won t get into the science with this guy, because that is what we have a scientist for. no.
clearly described 17 egregious violations of the standard of care. these 17 violations individually were likely to result in injury or death to michael jackson? yes. murray s defense team will call its own propofol expert, dr. paul white, to the stand. the pressure is growing on chernoff and flanagan to persuasively counter the prosecution s strong case. they have absolutely no examples of that. well, he presented dr. murray as a non-doctor. less than a lay person. right. and i think the jury believes all that. we have to bring them back to the issue of causation. you ve got to get it to be a cardiac arrest that starts this thing. otherwise, you lose mathematically. you really honestly think that during cross-examination of shafer he s going to admit that it s a cardiac arrest and we re going to have that argument, that conversation? no, he s not. i think he s got to admit he
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.