and they decided not to do it. so, if this legislation were to mean that you would risk a fine, say, for the union, if you walk out on strike and take all of your members out, would you risk a fine to go on strike? what they are saying is they will sack our members if they don t go to work. they are going to conscript our members. we have to name who will go to work. and if there members, in a lawful ballot, don t want to cross our picket line, they can be dismissed individually, and the union could be fined. so we will have to see what the law says. do you worry that it makes your strike action completely implausible, on basis, then? i don t think it will be implausible. it will make strikes and industrial completely entrenched. it will make them worse? it will make them worse. we will have to resort to work to rule, we will have to resort to long term overtime bans, partialstrikes, that will mean that disputes will become intractable, probably. and it may have completely the opposite
talks over christmas. and they decided not to do it. so, if this legislation were to mean that you would risk a fine, say, for the union, if you walk out on strike and take all of your members out, would you risk a fine to go on strike? what they are saying is they will sack our members if they don t go to work. they are going to conscript our members. we have to name who will go to work. and if there members, in a lawful ballot, don t want to cross our picket line, they can be dismissed individually, and the union could be fined. so we will have to see what the law says. do you worry that it makes your strike action completely implausible, on basis, then? i don t think it will be implausible. it will make strikes and industrial completely entrenched. it will make them worse? it will make them worse. we will have to resort to work to rule, we will have to resort to long term overtime bans, partialstrikes, that will mean that disputes will become intractable, probably. and it may have c
role particularly when borisjohnson is leading quite a fractious party when it comes to its voting habits and different pressure groups within the party has been formed. the zuma blitz is the kind ofjob where you actually need someone that kind of us is above reproach presumably it is the kind ofjob. us is above reproach presumably it is the kind ofjob. it is the kind of “0b. yes, you do, but it is the kind of “0b. yes, you do. but as it is the kind of “0b. yes, you do. but as i it is the kind ofjob. yes, you do, but as i say, it is the kind ofjob. yes, you do, but as i say, if it is the kind ofjob. yes, you do, but as i say, if these - it is the kind ofjob. yes, you do, but as i say, if these are i do, but as i say, if these are salacious bits of gossip there are gossip about every people, all members, it is gossip and journalists so, you know, unless there is evidence you can t discriminate against people is what i think i m trying to say on the basis of gossip. i
he s just tom brady now. hold on. why are they talking about joe burrow? why are they talking about matthew stafford and not me? that s how it goes. that s how it goes. they met up in a parking garage, eventually, you will just be almost as if they were cause one of those greats that people playing deep no longer talk about on a daily throat. on basis. january 5th of last year, the day before the attack on the tom, enjoy retirement. capitol, there was go sit your butt down. a meeting in a random d.c. parking raw, now, in a week or 2, he will between the leaders of two of the most release an instagram post, him radical right wing extremist with the football, him groups in america. throwing in the speculation is the proud boys, going to go all again. and the in other words, although they oath keepers. we ve known about this have one to say, he s a lot meeting for a little while now, no one involved has more aaron rodgers than we been particularly think. forthcoming about the do you thi
disappear inside of the united states. i don t believe the administration is making any effort whatsoever to control the border. their policy is not to control the border. but they can t say that. they implicitly force these border agents to go down there and put their lives at risk trying to control this influx of people which is suggested only going to get bigger. and that s in paul, the big question is will the biden administration pay that political price for essentially opening the borders like that. that remains to be seen. if more people keep coming up from haiti, south america and indeed africa is self, exponentially larger than what we are seeing now, yes are going pay a big political price because it shows literally, non- basis, their job is to protect that border and the refusing to do it as a matter of policy and eventually i think that will