people would say, it s a high school yearbook, but here he is as a supreme court nominee and he is repeatedly asked by senator whitehouse what does this mean, what does that mean? and he you know, he said that they were drinking games. or whatever. and to anybody with a dictionary, knows that that s not the case. should that be disqualifying, though? i think there s a pattern of him not being candid with the committee, it goes back to his nomination hearings in 2006. and also the fact that in the research that i did, is that he will mistake facts and one case that i m particularly familiar with, dealing with a case from hawaii, not only did he misstate the holding of the case, as being a 14 or 15th amendment decision, which is not true, and then he misapplies the case. so this is a pattern where he very much is outcome driven.
in the nomination hearings. but dr. ford s accusations are not theatrics. they are real. what about the intaking of the resumption? what about the intaking integrity of the resumption of innocence? i don t understand how you can say i m in the judiciary when an innocent person is seen let scott finish, evan. he said he didn t do let me get now to alice and bring you back into the conversation. a control room, i don t know if you saw my e-mail. i need the sound bite from the exchange between the women at the elevator and senator flake. let me know when you have that. we re not going to wait for it. let me come to you, alice, i m sure you ve seen it. have you seen the exchange there was the women for five minutes? let s play it. we ve got it. all right. forget the sound bite. we ve all seen it. what would you tell those women,
attorney general for num rerous reasons. the president berated sessions saying i don t have an attorney general. it s very sad then criticized the way sessions handled nomination hearings telling the hill he did very poorly. i mean he was mixed up and confused. he was getting very confusing answers. the real grudge seems to be recusal from the russia investigation. he gets in and probably because of the experience he had going through the nominating when somebody asked him the president has repeatedly pressed to investigate hillary clinton and her use of a private e-mail server. thank you very much. the latest attack. last month let this statement speak for itself saying the actions of the department of
act and the trump administration wants to narrow that. she is 85 and said she is going to maybe serve until she s 90 even and really going to have to continue with these dissents. the contentious and combative nomination hearings for brett kavanaugh this week has caught so many s attention. do you suppose she was watching it closely or has strong opinions about just how contentious it was? she would have been very disappointed. the reason is because we look at brett kavanaugh as someone who takes the bench for decades to come. he was not commenting a lot. instead what came up was politics. the trump administration was asking does he think a president can pardon himself and a
take out the supreme court confirmation hearings as a separate entity, how did the trump agenda advance this week? convince me that inside the west wing it was anything but the hunt for this author of the piece. it was the bob woodward first and then the hunt for the author. right. this was the week of the supreme court nomination hearings. this is something that the white house feels very good about. they feel like they have the votes on. of course, there was a lot of attention paid to that. then, you know, at the capitol. but at the white house, there s one thing after another. i mean, the job numbers came out today, and you can argue who should take credit for them, but they were pretty good. didn t get a lot of attention. you played some of what the president said on air force one. he also complained that stories about the economy aren t getting the attention they deserve. you could argue that it is because there s one drama after another at the white house. you know, this is