on that for over a year. we started to address that at the time of the appeal court judgment. the rwandans have been very, very good partners. we ve put both processes and structures in place which give us the reassurance of the integrity, the impartiality and professionalism of the rwandan judicial, judicial system, of the rwandan judicial system, and also about non refoulement. and that is basically a technical term that says that rwanda will not deport people who have been sent here. we have now got an internationally recognised, legally binding commitment from the rwandan government on those issues that is stronger than, stronger than the relationship that the unhcr has with rwanda, a relationship that has worked successfully for a number of years. well, responding to a question on that uk supreme court decision and to those critics of the plan, rwanda s foreign minister had this response. i see it, we were unfairly treated by international organisations, by the media, by
first question is what more do we know about why mr zelensky has cancelled? he know about why mr zelensky has cancelled? . , know about why mr zelensky has cancelled? ., , , ,.,, ., know about why mr zelensky has cancelled? ., , , ., , cancelled? he was supposed to be in that meeting cancelled? he was supposed to be in that meeting around cancelled? he was supposed to be in that meeting around about cancelled? he was supposed to be in that meeting around about one - cancelled? he was supposed to be in that meeting around about one hour| that meeting around about one hour ago. more than one hour ago. invited by the senate majority leader chuck schumer to address senators, closed all meeting. but he has not turned up all meeting. but he has not turned up and we understand that he may address editors in the coming days, not quite sure yet. this vote due to take place tomorrow is no agreement has been made by both parties so there is a sense that the vote may not go ahead,