what parents need to know just ahead. richard: breaking tonight, the supreme court has we have fm coverage of this breaking news tonight. matt finn is on the ground in eagle pass, texas, one of the flash points from the border crisis. we begin with white house correspondent peter doocy live from the north lawn with reaction to the supreme court ruling. good evening, peter. peter: good evening, rich. this means nothing has to change until february. that is when the states suing to keep title 42 in place will have their day in court. so, for at least a few more months, cbp is going to keep this extra tool to expel migrants. but nobody on either side of this debate is really celebrating this ruling. it s a relief, you know, somewhat. if the biden administration still wants to put in place a new immigration policy, the supreme court won t stop them as chief justice roberts writes his order does not prevent the federal government from taking any action with respect to that
are we even further from that point than we were a decade ago. we are certainly further from any kind of compromise. even though you have these bargains, these proposals. kyrsten sinema, thom tillis before the end of the year came up with their own comprehensive we form. it doesn t have support base of the party. what s interesting ruling from the court is neil gorsuch is in dissent he makes a very important point that mollie was alluding to which is this is about public health. title 42 is about public health and it really is excessive government overreach to use this to essentially do what congress should be doing. so this gives an opportunity for congress to have son-in-law kind of deal cut in the next few months before the supreme court makes its final ruling but i would not hold out hope that any bipartisan is upon us. rich: that s a good point. nolle take look. take a look at the dissenters, kagan, sotomayor, jackson and