because historically women have access. boy that ought to make your nervous. because we don t have a long history of protecting equal marriage, we ll have a long history of protecting interracial marriage. so alex what you think valid point? i m not sure if she read all 98 pages because he specifically says any draft opinion this would not apply to intimate relationships, marriage, he references contraception. it s also questionable when people talk about virginia and the supreme court case that made it unlawful to have interracial marriage or talk about justice clarence thomas who is in an interracial marriage were also taught about justice was in a racial family. to say that they re going to overturn such a precedent i think is outlandish. richard for the last several years conservatives have done a job using roe v. wade to get
court. people should not serve in public life and feel like outrageous extremis on any side of the political side have licenses to physically and verbally attack a public official. while some congressional lawmakers are willing to step up and call the radical fringe, over the white house, outgoing press secretary jen psaki. does the president want protesters to influence the justices so they uphold role you wade? he believes that that s part of our democracy and part of the history of the united states in this country. also tonight you alluded to this we are hearing from the courts longest-serving member about the leak where courts talk about justice clarence thomas he told a group of judges and lawyers that the 11th circuit judicial circuit of government institutions not be quote, bullied into delivering what some might consider their preferred outcome. more obviously over the weekend will keep an eye on it for you
smaller. our closing the gate for little less people will be have these conversations let s be very clear about what were saying with the applications of these decisions really are. i only have about 30 seconds hear about when i ask you could to run for senate if you become a senate republican, and were republicans take over the senate do you think that if there is a supreme court opening them and us couple of years in the final two years of joe biden s first term, do you think the republicans should denied to even hear that? absolutely i would only vote to confirm a justice who is in the mold of clarence thomas or scalia who believes that they said in a famous, no societal transformation without representation. they should not be decided by 5-4 majorities of unelected robes people in black robes. is how you feel about being married? they should be to facet by the people. by the people. by the people.
make it a 100, zero. nine unelected justices in black robes have made themselves the arbiters of the social issues of our time they should be decided by the people, and the states, not by unaccountable judges in washington, d.c., and other going to war behind 8-foot high walls and razor wire they shouldn t be surprised. they should not be making these grievously divisive decisions by five, six justices that should be devolved away from the federal government and back to the people where it belongs. see of a 6-3 court conservative majority what happens next in case this is decided roby weight is overturned. this is some and elizabeth warren had a say in a number of democrats are tardy about this. so when you read justice opinion when he focuses on his history. i says that we don t have to protect access to abortion.
between midnight friday, and midnight saturday to stop protests at the catholic churches. women can t be free. just one concern of heightened concern sweeping the country around the possible protests and the leaked draft opinion by the u.s. supreme court striking down roe v. wade. in washington concerns are so high that a nonscalable 8-foot high fence has been installed at just outside the high court. a move that comes as a liberal activist group calls for the fight to be taken directly to the residences of the courts conservative justices. even going so far as to post online maps and directions to their homes. google says of the groups post violate it terms of service. there s also questions tonight if that such protests or even legal. u.s. code says that it is unlawful to impede the administration of justice, at the home of an officer of the