the supreme court s six three decision striking down the use of racial preferences in college admissions. biden was sentpreferen out by wr winds him up to lie. aff affirmative action is so s misunderstood. many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unequal white students, unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualifie d. this is not this is not how college admissions work. now, the white house comms people aren t that ignorant.w th they know the truth that the entire point of preferences is to give minority candidates an edg me, regardless ofheir their test scores or the transcripts, or resume trani it s classic discrimination and it s based on race. colleges set out standards for admission and every student, every student has to meet those standards. meeand only that after firstmen meeting, the qualifications required by the school to college forget other factors. in additio other factorsn to thh such as race. okaasy what s less believablb that h
y for 6 hours as part of a lawsuit by delaware computer repair shop owner john paul mac isaac. now,ownera he s the one who gave hunter s laptop to the fbi. whoone hunter didn t comer back to pick it up. here s what hunterdidn t said. said everything went right. went great, sir. joining us now is miranda devine, new york post columnist and fox newsrk post no miranda, what are your sources telling you aboutu ? this depo ? hey ardepo well, look, they re being very tight lipped about it, butsafe i think it s a pretty safe bet to say that it was a prettyng s grueling session and that there were a lot of questionessid thst about the laptop and all the lies that have been told about it. i think we know from garythin shipley s testimony that the fbi had authenticated the laptop before they eveny possessed it from john paul,
appears to be a little grandstanding and they don t really have the information that law enforcement has. the civilian system works extremely well. you have the public safety exception to the miranda rule, so they can get information about other attacks. and the benefit of going through the civilian system is it would not be subject to later challenges, later appeals, later review by the circuit court and supreme court, as would the other alternatives that senator graham and senator mccain are talking about, which frankly, they haven t thought out that well. go ahead, jay. megyn, can i address the miranda issue? there s too much misinformation about miranda. we re looking at it based on television programs tv series. if there s a miranda violation, that means that that statement that individual made can t be used in a court of law against him. however, this individual julian is right, the fbi is gathering that they already said they took full responsibility to it to the
enemy combatant. i think based on what we re hearing, that decision will ultimately be made by the attorney general. but i think this is the clearly the case based on what we know for enemy combatant status. that would give us more time to investigate. do we want a prosecution or an investigation. and the answer is, we need an investigation. julian, the public safety exception to miranda allows them to talk to him without giving him his miranda rights, for some period of time, until they sort of satisfy themselves there s no more immediate threat. and then they can mirandize him. they ve done this in the past. they did it with the underwear bomber, the times square bomber. your thoughts on going that route? and i think the aclu would like that to be extraordinarily limited. yeah, a lot of critics on the left don t like that as well. the fbi has a very broad policy, a directive from the president himself, to use the public safety exception very broadly. it has been the policy of the
aclu, to be afforded all the same rights and treated the same way any of the three of us would if we were involved in robbing the corner store. and then you have the other side, graham and mccain who say, enemy combatant, no miranda, et cetera. jay, where do you fall on it? i think the department of justice right now has done the right thing by utilizing the public policy exception to the mirandaizing. that gives the department of explain briefly what that is. if in fact based on evidence that this plot was more extensive. if it is more extensive, and we have no evidence of any of this, the government s going to find that out quickly. then they can make the decision to declare him an enemy combatant that way. i think it gives him time. look, this is not a crime. this is an act of terror, an act of war against the united states. the fact that they re a u.s. citizen, the supreme court just said even if you re a u.s. citizen, you could be held as an