someone to coercive act. do i believe there should be element of process even though the allegations are much more serious than what ford alleged of kavanaugh because it was vague, absolute no corroboration of it. this is much more serious. but still he deserves some sort of hearing, there should be some sort of fact lining and the question is what would that look like. chris: you were shaking your head at rich, why? i was because it was dismissive of the allegations of dr. ford against brett kavanaugh and i think that she was very credible, the fact that he ended up on the supreme court while go figure that s politics but i don t want to dismiss her as, you know, as victim, survivor and at the same time not dismiss the dr. tyson, i guess it is and ms. watson.
do i believe there should be element of process even though the allegations are much more serious than what ford alleged of kavanaugh because it was vague, absolute no corroboration of it. this is much more serious. but still he deserves some sort of hearing, there should be some sort of fact lining and the question is what would that look like. chris: you were shaking your head at rich, why? i was because it was dismissive of the allegations of dr. ford against brett kavanaugh and i think that she was very credible, the fact that he ended up on the supreme court while go figure that s politics but i don t want to dismiss her as, you know, as victim, survivor and at the same time not dismiss the dr. tyson, i guess it is and ms. watson.
do i believe there should be element of process even though the allegations are much more serious than what ford alleged of kavanaugh because it was vague, absolute no corroboration of it. this is much more serious. but still he deserves some sort of hearing, there should be some sort of fact lining and the question is what would that look like. chris: you were shaking your head at rich, why? i was because it was dismissive of the allegations of dr. ford against brett kavanaugh and i think that she was very credible, the fact that he ended up on the supreme court while go figure that s politics but i don t want to dismiss her as, you know, as victim, survivor and at the same time not dismiss the dr. tyson, i guess it is and ms. watson.
divorce, his ex-wife had a sworn statement in those proceedings where she claimed that he emotionally abused her. so there may air may not be a pattern of behavior here. but the fact that they just blindly raised to embrace him, only because he opposed president trump and was trying to lead the charge to destroy him as despicable. sean: on msnbc 108 200 total whatever the number is. on those two channels, over 100. what about, ari, when people come over these issues come up, they don t know any of the facts, they know an allegation has been made, no corroboration, and then when you get deeper into it, like in the case of professor ford, she identified an eyewitness to the incident who said it did not happen, in asthat case. swetnick s allegation was so over-the-top from the get-go and she changed her story.
he s going to a very messy divorce and his ex-wife is a sworn statement in those proceedings where she claimed that he emotionally abused her. so there may or may not be a pattern of behavior here with mr. michael avenatti. but the fact that the left just blindly raced to embrace him only because he opposed president trump and was trying to lead the charge to take on cases to try to destroy him is despicable. sean: on msnbc, over 100. but what about, when these issues come up, people don t know any of the facts, they don t know if allegations have been made to, no corroboration. then you get deeper into it, like in the case of professor ford. they identified an eyewitness who said it didn t happen in that case. julie swetnick s story was so